these measures, which points entirely the other way; and the 
publication in English newspapers and constant discussion on English 
platforms of the painful incidents which seem, unfortunately, 
inseparable from a rigid administration of the law in Ireland, together 
with the prolonged debates, such incidents give rise to, in Parliament, 
aggravate the difficulties of administration, and lead the Irish people to 
believe that exceptional legislation will be as short-lived in the future 
as it has been in the past. 
It was this evidence of want of continuity of policy in 1885, and the 
startling disclosure of the weakness of the anti-national party in Ireland 
at the election in the autumn of that year, which finally convinced me 
that the time had come when we could no longer turn to a mixed policy 
of remedial and exceptional criminal legislation as the means of 
winning the constituencies of that country in support of our old system 
of governing Ireland. That system has failed for eighty-six years, and 
obviously cannot succeed when worked with representative institutions. 
As the people of Great Britain will not for a moment tolerate the 
withdrawal of representative government from Ireland, we must adopt 
some new plan. What I have here written deals with but a fragment of 
the arguments for Home Rule, some of which are admirably set forth 
by the able men who have written the articles to which this is the 
preface. I earnestly wish that they may arrest the attention of many 
excellent Irishmen who still cling to the old traditions of English rule, 
and cause them to realize that the only way of relieving their country 
from the intolerable uncertainty which hangs over her commercial, 
social, and political interests and paralyzes all efforts for the 
improvement of her people, will be to form a Constitution supported by 
all classes of the community. I trust that they will join in this work 
before it is too late, for they may yet exercise a powerful and salutary 
influence in the settlement of this great question.
FOOTNOTES: 
[Footnote 1: There was one case--North Louth--in which two 
Nationalists opposed one another, and I have left that case out of the 
calculation.] 
 
AMERICAN HOME RULE 
BY E.L. GODKIN 
American experience has been frequently cited, in the course of the 
controversy now raging in England over the Irish question, both by way 
of warning and of example. For instance, I have found in the Times as 
well as in other journals--the Spectator, I think, among the 
number--very contemptuous dismissals of the plan of offering Ireland a 
government like that of an American State, on the ground that the 
Americans are loyal to the central authority, while in Ireland there is a 
strong feeling of hostility to it, which would probably increase under 
Home Rule. The Queen's writ, it has been remarked, cannot be said to 
run in large parts of Ireland, while in every part of the United States the 
Federal writ is implicitly obeyed, and the ministers of Federal authority 
find ready aid and sympathy from the people. If I remember rightly, the 
Duke of Argyll has been very emphatic in pointing out the difference 
between giving local self-government to a community in which the 
tendencies of popular feeling are "centrifugal," and giving it to one in 
which these tendencies are "centripetal." The inference to be drawn was, 
of course, that as long as Ireland disliked the Imperial government the 
concession of Home Rule would be unsafe, and would only become 
safe when the Irish people showed somewhat the same sort of affection 
for the English connection which the people of the State of New York 
now feel for the Constitution of the United States. 
Among the multitude of those who have taken part in the controversy 
on one side or the other, no one has, so far as I have observed, pointed 
out that the state of feeling in America toward the central government 
with which the state of feeling in Ireland towards the British
Government is now compared, did not exist when the American 
Constitution was set up; that the political tendencies in America at that 
time were centrifugal, not centripetal, and that the extraordinary love 
and admiration with which Americans now regard the Federal 
government are the result of eighty years' experience of its working. 
The first Confederation was as much as the people could bear in the 
way of surrendering local powers when the War of Independence came 
to an end. It was its hopeless failure to provide peace and security 
which led to the framing of the present Constitution. But even with this 
experience still fresh, the adoption of the Constitution was no easy 
matter. I shall not burden this article with historical citations showing 
the very great difficulty which the framers of the Constitution had    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.