Indian Games | Page 4

quietly from the game if he can do so. If his
injury will not permit him, his relations carry him to the cabin and the
game continues until it is finished as if nothing bad happened."
"When the sides are equal the players will occupy an entire afternoon
without either side gaining any advantage; at other times one of the two
will gain the two games that they need to win. In this game you would
say to see them run that they looked like two parties who wanted to
fight. This exercise contributes much to render the savages alert and
prepared to avoid blows from the tomahawk of an enemy, when they

find themselves in a combat. Without being told in advance that it was
a game, one might truly believe that they fought in open country.
Whatever accident the game may cause, they attribute it to the chance
of the game and have no ill will towards each other. The suffering is for
the wounded, who bear it contentedly as if nothing had happened, thus
making it appear that they have a great deal of courage and are men."
"The side that wins takes whatever has been put up on the game and
whatever there is of profit, and that without any dispute on the part of
the others when it is a question of paying, no matter what the kind of
game. Nevertheless, if some person who is not in the game, or who has
not bet anything, should throw the ball to the advantage of one side or
the other, one of those whom the throw would not help would attack
him, demanding if this is his affair and why he has mixed himself with
it. They often come to quarrel about this and if some of the chiefs did
not reconcile them, there would be blood shed and perhaps some
killed."
Originally, the game was open to any number of competitors.
According to the Relation of 1636, "Village was pitted against village."
"Tribe was matched against tribe," says Perrot. The number engaged in
the game described by La Potherie [Footnote: Vol. II, p. 126.] was
estimated by him at two thousand. LaHontan [Footnote: Memoires de
L'Amerique Septentrionale, ou la Suite des Voyages de Mr. Le Baron
de LaHontan, Amsterdam, 1705, Vol. II, p. 113.] says that "the savages
commonly played it in large companies of three or four hundred at a
time," while Charlevoix [Footnote: Histoire de la Nouvelle France.
Journal d'un Voyage. etc, par le P. de Charlevoix, Paris, 1744, Vol. III,
p. 319.] says the number of players was variable and adds "for instance
if they are eighty," thus showing about the number he would expect to
find in a game. When Morgan [Footnote: League of the Iroquois, by
Lewis H. Morgan, Rochester, 1851, p. 294.] speaks of six or eight on a
side, he must allude to a later period, probably after the game was
modified by the whites who had adopted it among their amusements.
[Transcriber's Note: Lengthy footnote (2) relocated to chapter end.]
Our earliest accounts of the game as played by the Indians in the south

are about one hundred years later than the corresponding records in the
north. Adair [Footnote: The History of the American Indians,
particularly those Nations adjoining to the Mississippi, etc, by James
Adam, London, 1775, p. 399.] says the gamesters are equal in number
and speaks of "the crowd of players" preventing the one who "catches
the ball from throwing it off with a long direction." Bossu [Footnote:
Travels through that Part of North America formerly called Louisiana,
by Mr. Bossu, Captain in the French Marines. Translated from the
French by John Hemhold Forster, London, 1771, Vol. I, p. 304.] says,
"they are forty on each side," while Bartram [Footnote: Travels through
North and South Carolina, etc., by William Bartram, Philadelphia, 1701,
p. 508.] says, "the inhabitants of one town play against another in
consequence of a challenge." From this it would seem that among those
Indians, as at the North, the number of players was governed only by
the circumstances under which the game was played.
The ball, originally of wood, [Footnote: La Potherie, Vol. II, p. 126;
Perrot, p. 44.] was replaced by one made of deer skin. Adair gives the
following description of its manufacture: "The ball is made of a piece
of scraped deerskin, moistened, and stuffed hard with deer's hair, and
strongly sewed with deer's sinews." [Footnote: p. 400.]
According to Morgan the racket has undergone a similar change, from
a curved wooden head to the curved stick with open network, but we
have seen in the earliest description at our command, that in the days of
Perrot the cross was "laced like a racket." [Footnote: League of the
Iroquois. p.