History of the Early Part of the Reign of James the Second | Page 2

He grew up reckless of the worth of money, and for many years the

excitement of gambling was to him as one of the necessaries of life. His
immense energy at school and college made him work as hard as the
most diligent man who did nothing else, and devote himself to
gambling, horse-racing, and convivial pleasures as vigorously as if he
were the weak man capable of nothing else. The Eton boys all
prophesied his future fame. At Oxford, where he entered Hertford
College, he was one of the best men of his time, and one of the wildest.
A clergyman, strong in Greek, was arguing with young Fox against the
genuineness of a verse of the Iliad because its measure was unusual.
Fox at once quoted from memory some twenty parallels.
From college he went on the usual tour of Europe, spending lavishly,
incurring heavy debts, and sending home large bills for his father to
pay. One bill alone, paid by his father to a creditor at Naples, was for
sixteen thousand pounds. He came back in raiment of the highest
fashion, and was put into Parliament in 1768, not yet twenty years old,
as member for Midhurst. He began his political life with the family
opinions, defended the Ministry against John Wilkes, and was provided
promptly with a place as Paymaster of the Pensions to the Widows of
Land Officers, and then, when he had reached the age of twenty-one,
there was a seat found for him at the Board of Admiralty.
At once Fox made his mark in the House as a brilliant debater with an
intellectual power and an industry that made him master of the subjects
he discussed. Still also he was scattering money, and incurring debt,
training race-horses, and staking heavily at gambling tables. When a
noble friend, who was not a gambler, offered to bet fifty pounds upon a
throw, Fox declined, saying, "I never play for pence."
After a few years of impatient submission to Lord North, Fox broke
from him, and it was not long before he had broken from Lord North's
opinions and taken the side of the people in all leading questions. He
became the friend of Burke; and joined in the attack upon the policy of
Coercion that destroyed the union between England and her American
colonies. In 1774, at the age of twenty-five, Fox lost by death his father,
his mother, and his elder brother, who had succeeded to the title, and
who had left a little son to be his heir. In February of that year Lord

North had finally broken with Fox by causing a letter to be handed to
him in the House of Commons while he was sitting by his side on the
Treasury Bench.
"His Majesty has thought proper to order a new commission of the
Treasury to be made out, in which I do not perceive your name.
NORTH."
By the end of the year he was member for Malmesbury, and one of the
chiefs in opposition. When Lord North opened the session of 1775 with
a speech arguing the need of coercion, Fox compared what ought to
have been done with what was done, and said that Lord Chatham, the
King of Prussia, nay, even Alexander the Great, never gained more in
one campaign than Lord North had lost. He had lost a whole continent.
When Lord North's ministry fell in 1782, Fox became a Secretary of
State, resigning on the death of Rockingham. In coalition with Lord
North, Fox brought in an India Bill, which was rejected by the Lords,
and caused a resignation of the Ministry. Pitt then came into office, and
there was rivalry between a Pitt and a Fox of the second generation,
with some reversal in each son of the political bias of his father.
In opposing the policy that caused the American Revolution Fox and
Burke were of one mind. He opposed the slave trade. After the
outbreak of the French Revolution he differed from Burke, and
resolutely opposed Pitt's policy of interference by armed force.
William Pitt died on the 23rd January, 1806. Charles James Fox
became again a Secretary of State, and had set on foot negotiations for
a peace with France before his own death, eight months later, at the age
of fifty- seven.
During the last ten or twelve years of his life Fox had withdrawn from
the dissipations of his earlier years. His interest in horse-racing flagged
after the death, in 1793, of his friend Lord Foley, a kindly, honourable
man, upon whose judgment in such matters Fox had greatly relied.
Lord Foley began his sporting life with a clear estate of 1,800 pounds a
year, and 100,000 pounds in ready money. He ended his sporting and
his earthly life