or:
[1] Only give exact copies of it. Among other things, this requires that 
you do not remove, alter or modify the etext or this "small print!" 
statement. You may however, if you wish, distribute this etext in 
machine readable binary, compressed, mark-up, or proprietary form, 
including any form resulting from conversion by word pro- cessing or 
hypertext software, but only so long as *EITHER*: 
[*] The etext, when displayed, is clearly readable, and does *not* 
contain characters other than those intended by the author of the work, 
although tilde (~), asterisk (*) and underline (i) characters may be used 
to convey punctuation intended by the author, and additional characters 
may be used to indicate hypertext links; OR 
[*] The etext may be readily converted by the reader at no expense into 
plain ASCII, EBCDIC or equivalent form by the program that displays 
the etext (as is the case, for instance, with most word processors); OR 
[*] You provide, or agree to also provide on request at no additional 
cost, fee or expense, a copy of the etext in its original plain ASCII form 
(or in EBCDIC or other equivalent proprietary form). 
[2] Honor the etext refund and replacement provisions of this "Small 
Print!" statement. 
[3] Pay a trademark license fee to the Project of 20% of the net profits 
you derive calculated using the method you already use to calculate 
your applicable taxes. If you don't derive profits, no royalty is due. 
Royalties are payable to "Project Gutenberg 
Association/Carnegie-Mellon University" within the 60 days following 
each date you prepare (or were legally required to prepare) your annual 
(or equivalent periodic) tax return. 
WHAT IF YOU *WANT* TO SEND MONEY EVEN IF YOU 
DON'T HAVE TO? 
The Project gratefully accepts contributions in money, time, scanning 
machines, OCR software, public domain etexts, royalty free copyright 
licenses, and every other sort of contribution you can think of. Money
should be paid to "Project Gutenberg Association / Carnegie-Mellon 
University". 
*END*THE SMALL PRINT! FOR PUBLIC DOMAIN 
ETEXTS*Ver.04.29.93*END* 
 
Scanned by Martin Adamson 
[email protected] 
 
Travels Through France And Italy 
By Tobias Smollett 
 
INTRODUCTION 
By 
Thomas Seccombe 
I 
Many pens have been burnished this year of grace for the purpose of 
celebrating with befitting honour the second centenary of the birth of 
Henry Fielding; but it is more than doubtful if, when the right date 
occurs in March 1921, anything like the same alacrity will be shown to 
commemorate one who was for many years, and by such judges as 
Scott, Hazlitt, and Charles Dickens, considered Fielding's complement 
and absolute co-equal (to say the least) in literary achievement. 
Smollett's fame, indeed, seems to have fallen upon an unprosperous 
curve. The coarseness of his fortunate rival is condoned, while his is 
condemned without appeal. Smollett's value is assessed without 
discrimination at that of his least worthy productions, and the historical 
value of his work as a prime modeller of all kinds of new literary 
material is overlooked. Consider for a moment as not wholly unworthy 
of attention his mere versatility as a man of letters. Apart from
Roderick Random and its successors, which gave him a European fame, 
he wrote a standard history, and a standard version of Don Quixote 
(both of which held their ground against all comers for over a century). 
He created both satirical and romantic types, he wrote two fine-spirited 
lyrics, and launched the best Review and most popular magazine of his 
day. He was the centre of a literary group, the founder to some extent 
of a school of professional writers, of which strange and novel class, 
after the "Great Cham of Literature," as he called Dr. Johnson, he 
affords one of the first satisfactory specimens upon a fairly large scale. 
He is, indeed, a more satisfactory, because a more independent, 
example of the new species than the Great Cham himself. The late 
Professor Beljame has shown us how the milieu was created in which, 
with no subvention, whether from a patron, a theatre, a political 
paymaster, a prosperous newspaper or a fashionable subscription-list, 
an independent writer of the mid-eighteenth century, provided that he 
was competent, could begin to extort something more than a bare 
subsistence from the reluctant coffers of the London booksellers. For 
the purpose of such a demonstration no better illustration could 
possibly be found, I think, than the career of Dr. Tobias Smollett. And 
yet, curiously enough, in the collection of critical monographs so well 
known under the generic title of "English Men of Letters"--a series, by 
the way, which includes Nathaniel Hawthorne and Maria 
Edgeworth--no room or place has hitherto been found for Smollett any 
more than for Ben Jonson, both of them, surely, considerable Men of 
Letters in the very strictest and most representative sense of the term. 
Both Jonson and Smollett were to an unusual extent