than happened in the 
case of those who had no such experience of the deep brutality of the 
regime of post-Renaissance society. 
True as this is, it is also true that for one who won through there were 
many who gained nothing, and it was, and is, the sheer weight of 
numbers of those who failed of this that has made their influence on the 
modern life as pervasive and controlling as it is. 
What has happened is a certain degradation of character, a weakening 
of the moral stamina of men, and against this no mechanical device in 
government, no philosophical or social theory, can stand a chance of 
successful resistance, while material progress in wealth and trade and 
scientific achievement becomes simply a contributory force in the 
process of degeneration. For this degradation of character we are bound 
to hold this new social force in a measure responsible, even though it 
has so operated because of its inherent qualities and in no material 
respect through conscious cynicism or viciousness; indeed it is safe to 
say that in so far as it was acting consciously it was with good motives, 
which adds an element of even greater tragedy to a situation already 
sufficiently depressing. 
If I am right in holding this to be the effective cause of the situation we 
have now to meet, it is true that it is by no means the only one. The 
emancipation and deliverance of the downtrodden masses of men who 
owed their evil estate to the destruction of the Christian society of the 
Middle Ages, was a clamourous necessity; it was a slavery as bad in 
some ways as any that had existed in antiquity, and the number of its 
victims was greater. The ill results of the accomplished fact was largely 
due to the condition of religion which existed during the period of 
emancipation. No society can endure without vital religion, and any 
revolution effected at a time when religion is moribund or dissipated in 
contentious fragments, is destined to be evacuated of its ideals and its 
potential, and to end in disaster. Now the freeing of the slaves of the 
Renaissance and the post-Reformation, and their absorption in the body 
politic, was one of the greatest revolutions in history, and it came at a 
time when religion, which had been one and vital throughout Western 
Europe for six centuries, had been shattered and nullified, and its place 
taken, in the lands that saw the great liberation, by Calvinism, 
Lutheranism, Puritanism and atheism, none of which could exert a
guiding and redemptive influence on the dazed hordes that had at last 
come up into the light of day. 
In point of fact, therefore, we are bound to trace back the responsibility 
for the present crisis even to the Reformation itself, as well as to the 
tyranny and absolutism of government, and the sordid and profligate 
ordering of society, which followed on the end of Mediaevalism. 
So then we stand today confronting a situation that is ominous and 
obscure, since the very ideals and devices which we had held were the 
last word in progressive evolution have failed at the crisis, and because 
we who created them and have worked through them, have failed in 
character, and chiefly because we have accepted low ideals and inferior 
standards imposed upon us by social elements betrayed and abandoned 
by a world that could not aid them or assimilate them since itself had 
betrayed the only thing that could give them force, unity and coherency, 
that is, a vital and pervasive religious faith. 
There are those who hold our case to be desperate, to whom the 
disillusionment of peace, after the high optimism engendered by the 
vast heroism and the exalted ideals instigated by the war, has brought 
nothing but a mood of deep pessimism. The sentiment is perhaps 
natural, but it is none the less both irrational and wicked. If it is 
persisted in, if it becomes widespread, it may perfectly well justify 
itself, but only so. We no longer accept the Calvinistic doctrine of 
predestination, we believe, and must highly believe, that our fate is of 
our own making, for Christianity has made us the heirs of free-will. 
What we will that shall we be, or rather, what we are that shall we will, 
and if we make of ourselves what, by the grace of God, we may, then 
the victory rests with us. It is true that we are in the last years of a 
definite period, on that decline that precedes the opening of a new 
epoch. Never in history has any such period overpassed its limit of five 
hundred years, and ours, which came to birth in the last half of the 
fifteenth century, cannot outlast the present. But these declining years    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
 
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.
	    
	    
