Thoughts on Religion

Thoughts on Religion, by George
John Romanes

The Project Gutenberg EBook of Thoughts on Religion, by George
John Romanes This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost
and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it
away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License
included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.net
Title: Thoughts on Religion
Author: George John Romanes
Editor: Charles Gore
Release Date: October 25, 2005 [EBook #16942]
Language: English
Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK
THOUGHTS ON RELIGION ***

Produced by Marilynda Fraser-Cunliffe, Martin Pettit and the Online
Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net

Thoughts on Religion

BY THE LATE
GEORGE JOHN ROMANES M.A., LL.D., F.R.S.
EDITED BY
CHARLES GORE, D.D. BISHOP OF WORCESTER
Twelfth Impression
LONGMANS, GREEN, AND CO. 39 PATERNOSTER ROW,
LONDON AND BOMBAY
1904

CONTENTS
PAGE
EDITOR'S PREFACE 5

PART I.
THE INFLUENCE OF SCIENCE UPON RELIGION.
ESSAY I 37
ESSAY II 56

PART II.
NOTES FOR A WORK ON A CANDID EXAMINATION OF
RELIGION.

INTRODUCTORY NOTE BY THE EDITOR 91
§ 1. INTRODUCTORY 98
§ 2. DEFINITION OF TERMS AND PURPOSE OF THIS TREATISE
104
§ 3. CAUSALITY 116
§ 4. FAITH 131
§ 5. FAITH IN CHRISTIANITY 154
CONCLUDING NOTE BY THE EDITOR 184

PUBLISHER'S NOTE
The present edition of Romanes' Thoughts on Religion is issued in
response to a request which has been made with some frequency of late
for very cheap reprints of standard religious and theological works.
39 PATERNOSTER ROW, LONDON, January, 1904.

EDITOR'S PREFACE
The late Mr. George John Romanes--the author within the last few
years of Darwin and After Darwin, and of the Examination of
Weismannism--occupied a distinguished place in contemporary biology.
But his mind was also continuously and increasingly active on the
problems of metaphysics and theology. And at his death in the early
summer of this year (1894), he left among his papers some notes, made
mostly in the previous winter, for a work which he was intending to
write on the fundamental questions of religion. He had desired that
these notes should be given to me and that I should do with them as I
thought best. His literary executors accordingly handed them over to
me, in company with some unpublished essays, two of which form the

first part of the present volume.
After reading the notes myself, and obtaining the judgement of others
in whom I feel confidence upon them, I have no hesitation either in
publishing by far the greater part of them, or in publishing them with
the author's name in spite of the fact that the book as originally
projected was to have been anonymous. From the few words which
George Romanes said to me on the subject, I have no doubt that he
realized that the notes if published after his death must be published
with his name.
I have said that after reading these notes I feel no doubt that they ought
to be published. They claim it both by their intrinsic value and by the
light they throw on the religious thought of a scientific man who was
not only remarkably able and clear-headed, but also many-sided, as few
men are, in his capacities, and singularly candid and open-hearted. To
all these qualities the notes which are now offered to the public will
bear unmistakeable witness.
With more hesitation it has been decided to print also the unpublished
essays already referred to. These, as representing an earlier stage of
thought than is represented in the notes, naturally appear first.
Both Essays and Notes however represent the same tendency of a mind
from a position of unbelief in the Christian Revelation toward one of
belief in it. They represent, I say, a tendency of one 'seeking after God
if haply he might feel after Him and find Him,' and not a position of
settled orthodoxy. Even the Notes contain in fact many things which
could not come from a settled believer. This being so it is natural that I
should say a word as to the way in which I have understood my
function as an editor. I have decided the question of publishing each
Note solely by the consideration whether or no it was sufficiently
finished to be intelligible. I have rigidly excluded any question of my
own agreement or disagreement with it. In the case of one Note in
particular, I doubt whether I should have published it, had it not been
that my decided disagreement with its contents made me fear that I
might be prejudiced in withholding it.

The Notes, with the papers which precede them, will, I think, be better
understood if I give some preliminary account of their antecedents, that
is of Romanes'