The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke, Vol. IV

The Works of the Right
Honourable Edmund Burke, Vol.
IV

The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Works of the Right Honourable
Edmund
Burke, Vol. IV. (of 12), by Edmund Burke This eBook is for the use of
anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever.
You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project
Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at
www.gutenberg.net
Title: The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke, Vol. IV. (of
12)
Author: Edmund Burke
Release Date: April 24, 2005 [EBook #15700]
Language: English
Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK BURKE
VOL 4 ***

Produced by Paul Murray, Susan Skinner and the Online Distributed
Proofreading Team from images generously made available by the
Bibliothèque nationale de France (BnF/Gallica) at http://gallica.bnf.fr

THE WORKS

OF
THE RIGHT HONOURABLE
EDMUND BURKE
IN TWELVE VOLUMES
VOLUME THE FOURTH
[Illustration: Burke Coat of Arms.]
LONDON JOHN C. NIMMO 14, KING WILLIAM STREET,
STRAND, W.C. MDCCCLXXXVII

CONTENTS OF VOL IV.
LETTER TO A MEMBER OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY, IN
ANSWER TO SOME OBJECTIONS TO HIS BOOK ON FRENCH
AFFAIRS 1
APPEAL FROM THE NEW TO THE OLD WHIGS 57
LETTER TO A PEER OF IRELAND ON THE PENAL LAWS
AGAINST IRISH CATHOLICS 217
LETTER TO SIR HERCULES LANGRISHE, ON THE SUBJECT OF
THE ROMAN CATHOLICS OF IRELAND 241
HINTS FOR A MEMORIAL TO BE DELIVERED TO MONSIEUR
DE M.M. 307
THOUGHTS ON FRENCH AFFAIRS 313
HEADS FOR CONSIDERATION ON THE PRESENT STATE OF
AFFAIRS 379
REMARKS ON THE POLICY OF THE ALLIES WITH RESPECT
TO FRANCE: WITH AN APPENDIX 403

A
LETTER
TO
A MEMBER OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY,
IN
ANSWER TO SOME OBJECTIONS TO HIS BOOK ON FRENCH
AFFAIRS.
1791.
Sir,--I had the honor to receive your letter of the 17th of November last,
in which, with some exceptions, you are pleased to consider favorably

the letter I have written on the affairs of France. I shall ever accept any
mark of approbation attended with instruction with more pleasure than
general and unqualified praises. The latter can serve only to flatter our
vanity; the former, whilst it encourages us to proceed, may help to
improve us in our progress.
Some of the errors you point out to me in my printed letter are really
such. One only I find to be material. It is corrected in the edition which
I take the liberty of sending to you. As to the cavils which may be made
on some part of my remarks with regard to the gradations in your new
Constitution, you observe justly that they do not affect the substance of
my objections. Whether there be a round more or less in the ladder of
representation by which your workmen ascend from their parochial
tyranny to their federal anarchy, when the whole scale is false, appears
to me of little or no importance.
I published my thoughts on that Constitution, that my countrymen
might be enabled to estimate the wisdom of the plans which were held
out to their imitation. I conceived that the true character of those plans
would be best collected from the committee appointed to prepare them.
I thought that the scheme of their building would be better
comprehended in the design of the architects than in the execution of
the masons. It was not worth my reader's while to occupy himself with
the alterations by which bungling practice corrects absurd theory. Such
an investigation would be endless: because every day's past experience
of impracticability has driven, and every day's future experience will
drive, those men to new devices as exceptionable as the old, and which
are no otherwise worthy of observation than as they give a daily proof
of the delusion of their promises and the falsehood of their professions.
Had I followed all these changes, my letter would have been only a
gazette of their wanderings, a journal of their march from error to error,
through a dry, dreary desert, unguided by the lights of Heaven, or by
the contrivance which wisdom has invented to supply their place.
I am unalterably persuaded that the attempt to oppress, degrade,
impoverish, confiscate, and extinguish the original gentlemen and
landed property of a whole nation cannot be justified under any form it
may assume. I am satisfied beyond a doubt, that the project of turning a
great empire into a vestry, or into a collection of vestries, and of
governing it in the spirit of a parochial administration, is senseless and

absurd, in any mode or with any qualifications. I can never be
convinced that the scheme of placing the highest powers of the state in
church-wardens and constables and other such officers, guided by the
prudence of litigious attorneys and