The Works of Robert G. Ingersoll, Volume VIII | Page 2

POLITICS, New York Advertiser
SPIRITUALISM, St. Louis Globe-Democrat
PLAYS AND PLAYERS, New York Dramatic Mirror
WOMAN, A Fragment
STRIKES, EXPANSION AND OTHER SUBJECTS, New York, May 5, 1893
SUNDAY A DAY OF PLEASURE, New York Times
THE PARLIAMENT OF RELIGIONS, New York Herald
CLEVELAND'S HAWAIIAN POLICY, Chicago Inter-Ocean
ORATORS AND ORATORY, London Sketch
CATHOLICISM AND PROTESTANTISM.--THE POPE.--THE A. P. A., AGNOSTICISM AND THE CHURCH, New York Herald
WOMAN AND HER DOMAIN, Grand Rapids Democrat
PROFESSOR SWING, Chicago Inter-Ocean
SENATOR SHERMAN AND HIS BOOK, St. Louis Globe-Democrat
REPLY TO THE CHRISTIAN ENDEAVORERS, New York Journal
SPIRITUALISM, New York Journal
A LITTLE OF EVERYTHING, Rochester Herald
IS LIFE WORTH LIVING?--CHRISTIAN SCIENCE AND POLITICS, Chicago Inter-Ocean
VIVISECTION, New York Evening Telegram
DIVORCE, New York Herald
MUSIC, NEWSPAPERS, LYNCHING AND ARBITRATION, Chicago Inter-Ocean
A VISIT TO SHAW'S GARDEN, St. Louis Republic
THE VENEZUELA BOUNDARY DISCUSSION AND THE WHIPPING POST, New York Journal
COLONEL SHEPARD'S STAGE HORSES, New York Morning Advertiser
A REPLY TO THE REV. L. A. BANKS, Cleveland Plain Dealer
CUBA--ZOLA AND THEOSOPHY, Louisville Courier-Journal
HOW TO BECOME AN ORATOR, New York Sun
JOHN RUSSELL YOUNG AND EXPANSION, Philadelphia Press
PSYCHICAL RESEARCH AND THE BIBLE, New York Mind
THIS CENTURY'S GLORIES, New York Sun
CAPITAL PUNISHMENT AND THE WHIPPING POST, Chicago Tribune
EXPANSION AND TRUSTS, Philadelphia North American
INTERVIEWS
THE BIBLE AND A FUTURE LIFE
Question. Colonel, are your views of religion based upon the Bible?
Answer. I regard the Bible, especially the Old Testament, the same as I do most other ancient books, in which there is some truth, a great deal of error, considerable barbarism and a most plentiful lack of good sense.
Question. Have you found any other work, sacred or profane, which you regard as more reliable?
Answer. I know of no book less so, in my judgment.
Question. You have studied the Bible attentively, have you not?
Answer. I have read the Bible. I have heard it talked about a good deal, and am sufficiently well acquainted with it to justify my own mind in utterly rejecting all claims made for its divine origin.
Question. What do you base your views upon?
Answer. On reason, observation, experience, upon the discoveries in science, upon observed facts and the analogies properly growing out of such facts. I have no confidence in anything pretending to be outside, or independent of, or in any manner above nature.
Question. According to your views, what disposition is made of man after death?
Answer. Upon that subject I know nothing. It is no more wonderful that man should live again than he now lives; upon that question I know of no evidence. The doctrine of immortality rests upon human affection. We love, therefore we wish to live.
Question. Then you would not undertake to say what becomes of man after death?
Answer. If I told or pretended to know what becomes of man after death, I would be as dogmatic as are theologians upon this question. The difference between them and me is, I am honest. I admit that I do not know.
Question. Judging by your criticism of mankind, Colonel, in your recent lecture, you have not found his condition very satisfactory?
Answer. Nature, outside of man, so far as I know, is neither cruel nor merciful. I am not satisfied with the present condition of the human race, nor with the condition of man during any period of which we have any knowledge. I believe, however, the condition of man is improved, and this improvement is due to his own exertions. I do not make nature a being. I do not ascribe to nature intentions.
Question. Is your theory, Colonel, the result of investigation of the subject?
Answer. No one can control his own opinion or his own belief. My belief was forced upon me by my surroundings. I am the product of all circumstances that have in any way touched me. I believe in this world. I have no confidence in any religion promising joys in another world at the expense of liberty and happiness in this. At the same time, I wish to give others all the rights I claim for myself.
Question. If I asked for proofs for your theory, what would you furnish?
Answer. The experience of every man who is honest with himself, every fact that has been discovered in nature. In addition to these, the utter and total failure of all religionists in all countries to produce one particle of evidence showing the existence of any supernatural power whatever, and the further fact that the people are not satisfied with their religion. They are continually asking for evidence. They are asking it in every imaginable way. The sects are continually dividing. There is no real religious serenity in the world. All religions are opponents of intellectual liberty. I believe in absolute mental freedom. Real religion with me is a thing not of the head, but of the heart; not a theory, not a creed, but a life.
Question. What punishment, then, is inflicted upon man for his crimes and wrongs committed in this life?
Answer. There is no such