The Works of Guy de Maupassant, Volume VIII

The Works of Guy de
Maupassant, Volume VIII., by

Guy de Maupassant This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no
cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give
it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License
included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
Title: The Works of Guy de Maupassant, Volume VIII.
Author: Guy de Maupassant
Release Date: July 14, 2007 [EBook #22069]
Language: English
Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK WORKS OF
GUY DE MAUPASSANT ***

Produced by Juliet Sutherland, Sankar Viswanathan, and the Online
Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net

The Works of
Guy de Maupassant

VOLUME VIII

PIERRE ET JEAN
AND OTHER STORIES

ILLUSTRATED

NATIONAL LIBRARY COMPANY
NEW YORK

COPYRIGHT, 1909, BY
BIGELOW, SMITH & CO.
* * * * *

CONTENTS
PIERRE ET JEAN.
DREAMS
MOONLIGHT
THE CORSICAN BANDIT
A DEAD WOMAN'S SECRET
THE CAKE

A LIVELY FRIEND
THE ORPHAN
THE BLIND MAN
A WIFE'S CONFESSION
RELICS OF THE PAST
THE PEDDLER
THE AVENGER
ALL OVER
LETTER FOUND ON A DROWNED MAN
MOTHER AND SON
THE SPASM
A DUEL
THE LOVE OF LONG AGO
AN UNCOMFORTABLE BED
A WARNING NOTE
THE HORRIBLE
A NEW YEAR'S GIFT
BESIDE A DEAD MAN
AFTER
A QUEER NIGHT IN PARIS

BOITELLE
* * * * *

OF "THE NOVEL"
I do not intend in these pages to put in a plea for this little novel. On the
contrary, the ideas I shall try to set forth will rather involve a criticism
of the class of psychological analysis which I have undertaken in Pierre
et Jean. I propose to treat of novels in general.
I am not the only writer who finds himself taken to task in the same
terms each time he brings out a new book. Among many laudatory
phrases, I invariably meet with this observation, penned by the same
critics: "The greatest fault of this book is that it is not, strictly speaking,
a novel."
The same form might be adopted in reply:
"The greatest fault of the writer who does me the honor to review me is
that he is not a critic."
For what are, in fact, the essential characteristics of a critic?
It is necessary that, without preconceived notions, prejudices of
"School," or partisanship for any class of artists, he should appreciate,
distinguish, and explain the most antagonistic tendencies and the most
dissimilar temperaments, recognizing and accepting the most varied
efforts of art.
Now the Critic who, after reading Manon Lescaut, Paul and Virginia,
Don Quixote, Les Liaisons dangereuses, Werther, Elective Affinities
(Wahlverwandschaften), Clarissa Harlowe, Émile, Candide,
Cinq-Mars, René, Les Trois Mousquetaires, Mauprat, Le Père Goriot,
La Cousine Bette, Colomba, Le Rouge et le Noir, Mademoiselle de
Maupin, Notre-Dame de Paris, Salammbo, Madame Bovary,
Adolphe,M. de Camors, l'Assommoir, Sapho, etc., still can be so bold as

to write "This or that is, or is not, a novel," seems to me to be gifted
with a perspicacity strangely akin to incompetence. Such a critic
commonly understands by a novel a more or less improbable narrative
of adventure, elaborated after the fashion of a piece for the stage, in
three acts, of which the first contains the exposition, the second the
action, and the third the catastrophe or dénouement.
And this method of construction is perfectly admissible, but on
condition that all others are accepted on equal terms.
Are there any rules for the making of a novel, which, if we neglect, the
tale must be called by another name? If Don Quixote is a novel, then is
Le Rouge et le Noir a novel? If Monte Christo is a novel, is
l'Assommoir? Can any conclusive comparison be drawn between
Goethe's Elective Affinities, The Three Mousqueteers, by Dumas,
Flaubert's Madame Bovary, M. de Camors by Octave Feuillet, and
Germinal, by Zola? Which of them all is The Novel? What are these
famous rules? Where did they originate? Who laid them down? And in
virtue of what principle, of whose authority, and of what reasoning?
And yet, as it would appear, these critics know in some positive and
indisputable way what constitutes a novel, and what distinguishes it
from other tales which are not novels. What this amounts to is that
without being producers themselves they are enrolled under a School,
and that, like the writers of novels, they reject all work which is
conceived and executed outside the pale of their esthetics. An
intelligent critic ought, on the contrary, to seek out everything which
least resembles the novels already written, and urge young authors as
much as possible to try fresh paths.
All writers, Victor Hugo as much as M. Zola, have insistently claimed
the absolute and incontrovertible right to compose--that is to say, to