The Two Paths

The Two Paths [with accents]

The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Two Paths, by John Ruskin
Copyright laws are changing all over the world. Be sure to check the
copyright laws for your country before downloading or redistributing
this or any other Project Gutenberg eBook.
This header should be the first thing seen when viewing this Project
Gutenberg file. Please do not remove it. Do not change or edit the
header without written permission.
Please read the "legal small print," and other information about the
eBook and Project Gutenberg at the bottom of this file. Included is
important information about your specific rights and restrictions in how
the file may be used. You can also find out about how to make a
donation to Project Gutenberg, and how to get involved.
**Welcome To The World of Free Plain Vanilla Electronic Texts**
**eBooks Readable By Both Humans and By Computers, Since
1971**
*****These eBooks Were Prepared By Thousands of
Volunteers!*****
Title: The Two Paths
Author: John Ruskin
Release Date: January, 2005 [EBook #7291] [This file was first posted
on April 7, 2003]
Edition: 10

Language: English
Character set encoding: ISO Latin-1
*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK, THE TWO
PATHS ***

Michelle Shephard, Eric Eldred, Charles Franks and the Online
Distributed Proofreading Team

THE TWO PATHS
By John Ruskin, M.A.

CONTENTS.
THE TWO PATHS.
LECTURE I. THE DETERIORATIVE POWER OF
CONVENTIONAL ART OVER NATIONS
LECTURE II. THE UNITY OF ART
LECTURE III. MODERN MANUFACTURE AND DESIGN
LECTURE IV. THE INFLUENCE OF IMAGINATION IN
ARCHITECTURE
LECTURE V. THE WORK OF IRON, IN NATURE, ART, AND
POLICY
APPENDICES

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS.
THE TWO PATHS.
THE IDEAL OF AN ANGEL THE SERPENT BEGUILING EVE
CONTRAST SYMMETRY ORNAMENT CLASSICAL
ARCHITECTURE CENTREPIECE OF BALCONY GENERAL
EFFECT OF MASSES PROFILE TEETH OF THE BORDER
BORDER AT THE SIDE OF BALCONY OUTLINE OF
RETRACTED LEAVES

PREFACE.

The following addresses, though spoken at different times, are
intentionally connected in subject; their aim being to set one or two
main principles of art in simple light before the general student, and to
indicate their practical bearing on modern design. The law which it has
been my effort chiefly to illustrate is the dependence of all noble design,
in any kind, on the sculpture or painting of Organic Form.
This is the vital law; lying at the root of all that I have ever tried to
teach respecting architecture or any other art. It is also the law most
generally disallowed.
I believe this must be so in every subject. We are all of us willing
enough to accept dead truths or blunt ones; which can be fitted
harmlessly into spare niches, or shrouded and coffined at once out of
the way, we holding complacently the cemetery keys, and supposing
we have learned something. But a sapling truth, with earth at its root
and blossom on its branches; or a trenchant truth, that can cut its way
through bars and sods; most men, it seems to me, dislike the sight or
entertainment of, if by any means such guest or vision may be avoided.
And, indeed, this is no wonder; for one such truth, thoroughly accepted,
connects itself strangely with others, and there is no saying what it may
lead us to.
And thus the gist of what I have tried to teach about architecture has
been throughout denied by my architect readers, even when they
thought what I said suggestive in other particulars. "Anything but that.
Study Italian Gothic?--perhaps it would be as well: build with pointed
arches?--there is no objection: use solid stone and well-burnt brick?--
by all means: but--learn to carve or paint organic form ourselves! How
can such a thing be asked? We are above all that. The carvers and
painters are our servants--quite subordinate people. They ought to be
glad if we leave room for them."
Well: on that it all turns. For those who will not learn to carve or paint,
and think themselves greater men because they cannot, it is wholly
wasted time to read any words of mine; in the truest and sternest sense
they can read no words of mine; for the most familiar I can
use--"form," "proportion," "beauty," "curvature," "colour"--are used in
a sense which by no effort I can communicate to such readers; and in
no building that I praise, is the thing that I praise it for, visible to them.
And it is the more necessary for me to state this fully; because so-

called Gothic or Romanesque buildings are now rising every day
around us, which might be supposed by the public more or less to
embody the principles of those styles, but which embody not one of
them, nor any shadow or fragment of them; but merely serve to
caricature the noble buildings