The Querist | Page 4

wise State should not be, to
encourage industry in its members? And whether those who employ

neither heads nor hands for the common benefit deserve not to be
expelled like drones out of a well-governed State?
4. Qu. Whether the four elements, and man's labour therein, be not the
true source of wealth?
5. Qu. Whether money be not only so far useful, as it stirreth up
industry, enabling men mutually to participate the fruits of each other's
labour?
6. Qu. Whether any other means, equally conducing to excite and
circulate the industry of mankind, may not be as useful as money.
7. Qu. Whether the real end and aim of men be not power? And
whether he who could have everything else at his wish or will would
value money?
8. Qu. Whether the public aim in every well-govern'd State be not that
each member, according to his just pretensions and industry, should
have power?
9. Qu. Whether power be not referred to action; and whether action
doth not follow appetite or will?
10. Qu. Whether fashion doth not create appetites; and whether the
prevailing will of a nation is not the fashion?
11. Qu. Whether the current of industry and commerce be not
determined by this prevailing will?
12. Qu. Whether it be not owing to custom that the fashions are
agreeable?
13. Qu. Whether it may not concern the wisdom of the legislature to
interpose in the making of fashions; and not leave an affair of so great
influence to the management of women and fops, tailors and vintners?
14. Qu. Whether reasonable fashions are a greater restraint on freedom
than those which are unreasonable?

15. Qu. Whether a general good taste in a people would not greatly
conduce to their thriving? And whether an uneducated gentry be not the
greatest of national evils?
16. Qu. Whether customs and fashions do not supply the place of
reason in the vulgar of all ranks? Whether, therefore, it doth not very
much import that they should be wisely framed?
17. Qu. Whether the imitating those neighbours in our fashions, to
whom we bear no likeness in our circumstances, be not one cause of
distress to this nation?
18. Qu. Whether frugal fashions in the upper rank, and comfortable
living in the lower, be not the means to multiply inhabitants?
19. Qu. Whether the bulk of our Irish natives are not kept from thriving,
by that cynical content in dirt and beggary which they possess to a
degree beyond any other people in Christendom?
20. Qu. Whether the creating of wants be not the likeliest way to
produce industry in a people? And whether, if our peasants were
accustomed to eat beef and wear shoes, they would not be more
industrious?
21. Qu. Whether other things being given, as climate, soil, etc., the
wealth be not proportioned to the industry, and this to the circulation of
credit, be the credit circulated or transferred by what marks or tokens
soever?
22. Qu. Whether, therefore, less money swiftly circulating, be not, in
effect, equivalent to more money slowly circulating? Or, whether, if the
circulation be reciprocally as the quantity of coin, the nation can be a
loser?
23. Qu. Whether money is to be considered as having an intrinsic value,
or as being a commodity, a standard, a measure, or a pledge, as is
variously suggested by writers? And whether the true idea of money, as
such, be not altogether that of a ticket or counter?

24. Qu. Whether the value or price of things be not a compounded
proportion, directly as the demand, and reciprocally as the plenty?
25. Qu. Whether the terms crown, livre, pound sterling, etc., are not to
be considered as exponents or denominations of such proportion? And
whether gold, silver, and paper are not tickets or counters for reckoning,
recording, and transferring thereof?
26. Qu. Whether the denominations being retained, although the bullion
were gone, things might not nevertheless be rated, bought, and sold,
industry promoted, and a circulation of commerce maintained?
27. Qu. Whether an equal raising of all sorts of gold, silver, and copper
coin can have any effect in bringing money into the kingdom? And
whether altering the proportions between the kingdom several sorts can
have any other effect but multiplying one kind and lessening another,
without any increase of the sum total?
28. Qu. Whether arbitrary changing the denomination of coin be not a
public cheat?
29. Qu. Whether, nevertheless, the damage would be very considerable,
if by degrees our money were brought back to the English value there
to rest for ever?
30. Qu. Whether the English crown did not formerly pass with us for
six shillings? And what inconvenience ensued to the public upon its
reduction to the present value, and whether what hath