The Public Orations of Demosthenes, vol 2 | Page 2

submit. Soon after the
Peace of Philocrates, Athens sent settlers to the Chersonese under
Diopeithes. Cardia alone refused to receive them, and Diopeithes, with
a mercenary force, prepared to compel the Cardians to admit them;
while Philip sent troops to hold the town, and complained to Athens in
threatening terms of the actions of Diopeithes, and more particularly of

an inroad which Diopeithes had made upon Philip's territory in Thrace.
Diopeithes had been ill-supported with money and men by Athens, and
had had recourse to piratical actions, in order to obtain supplies, thus
arousing some indignation at Athens; but the prospect of the heavy
expenditure which would be necessary, if an expedition were sent to his
aid, was also unattractive. Demosthenes, however, proposed that
Diopeithes should be vigorously supported, on the ground that Philip
was really at war with Athens, and that this was not the time to
interfere with the general who alone was pushing the Athenian cause.
The speech was delivered early in the spring of 341. It is a masterpiece
of oratory, at once statesmanlike and impassioned, and shows a
complete command of every variety of tone. The latter part of it
contains a strong denunciation of the Macedonian party in Athens, a
defence of the orator's own career, and an urgent demand for the
punishment of disloyalty. At the same time Demosthenes does not
embody the policy which he advises in any formal motion. For this we
have to wait for the Third Philippic.]
{1} It was the duty, men of Athens, of every speaker not to allow either
malice or favour to influence any speech which he might make, but
simply to declare the policy which he considered to be the best,
particularly when your deliberations were concerned with public affairs
of great importance. But since there are some who are led on to address
you, partly out of contentiousness, partly from causes which I need not
discuss, it is for you, men of Athens--you, the People--to dismiss all
other considerations, and both in the votes that you give and in the
measures that you take to attend solely to what you believe to be for the
good of the city. {2} Now our present anxiety arises out of affairs in
the Chersonese, and the campaign, now in its eleventh month, which
Philip is conducting in Thrace. But most of the speeches which we
have heard have been about the acts and intentions of Diopeithes. For
my part, I conceive that all charges made against any one who is
amenable to the laws and can be punished by you when you will are
matters which you are free to investigate, either immediately or after an
interval, as you think fit; and there is no occasion for me or any one
else to use strong language about them. {3} But all those advantages
which an actual enemy of the city, with a large force in the Hellespont,
is trying to snatch from you, and which, if we once fall behind-hand,

we shall no longer be able to recover--these, surely, are matters upon
which our interest demands that our plans be formed and our
preparations made with the utmost dispatch; and that no clamour, no
accusations about other matters, be allowed to drive us from this point.
{4} Often as I am surprised at the assertions which are habitually made
in your presence, nothing, men of Athens, has surprised me more than
the remark which I heard only lately in the Council--that one who
advises you ought, forsooth, to advise you plainly either to go to war or
to keep the peace. {5} Very good.[3] If Philip is remaining inactive, if
he is keeping nothing that is ours, in violation of the Peace, if he is not
organizing all mankind against us, there is nothing more to be said--we
have simply to observe the Peace; and I see that, for your part, you are
quite ready to do so. But what if the oath that we swore, and the terms
upon which we made the Peace, stand inscribed for our eyes to see? {6}
What if it is proved that from the outset, before Diopeithes sailed from
Athens with the settlers who are now accused of having brought about
the war, Philip wrongfully seized many of our possessions--and here,
unrepealed, are your resolutions charging him with this--and that all
along he has been uninterruptedly seizing the possessions of the other
Hellenic and foreign peoples, and uniting their resources against us?
What is then the meaning of the statement that we ought either to go to
war or to keep the Peace? {7} For we have no choice in the matter:
nothing remains open to us but the most righteous and most necessary
of all acts--the act that they deliberately