creatures are built into this
building that we call England, or English history, or English
civilisation.
_He:_ And what about the man who built St. Paul's Cathedral?
_I:_ It is a collective work, as are all the great works that have been
done. The architecture of St. Paul's is one of the ancient styles, and no
style in architecture was ever invented or created by one person, but by
generations and generations.
_He:_ And what about Victor Hugo and Milton? Are they not great
poets?
_I:_ Yes, they are if compared with certain minor poets, but they are
not great if compared with the popular poetry of India or Greece.
Mahabarata, the Koran, and Zend-Avesta, and the Bible, are products
of collective efforts--therefore they are superior to every personal
effort.
_He:_ Do you not appreciate the great economists and what they did
for the household, and common-wealth in general?
_I:_ Certainly I do; but their work is too much overestimated. Not a
handful of economic writers, like Adam Smith and Marx, but the
common genius of generations and generations arranged the house, set
the furniture, created the cooking, constructed towns, invented plays
and enjoyments, customs, language, and so forth.
_He:_ You agree, I think, that Shaljapin and Caruso have wonderful
voices, don't you?
_I:_ Yes, I agree. But don't you agree that a choir of millions of human
voices would be something much more striking and wonderful than any
solo singer since the beginning of time?
_He:_ Don't you believe in the wisdom of wise men like Kant and
Spencer?
_I:_ No, I don't. I think there is incomparably more healthy and more
applicable wisdom in the popular sayings, proverbs, parables, and tales
of the nations, cultivated and uncultivated, in Macedonia, Armenia,
Ceylon, New Zealand, Japan, &c., than in some dozen of the greatest
thinkers of Europe.
_He:_ Who is then in your opinion a great man?
_I:_ Only a good man is a great man to me, who is conscious that he is
a cell in the panhuman organism, or a brick in the building of human
history. Such a man is more a man of truth and of the future than any
conqueror, who thinks that a hundred millions of people and hundreds
of years have waited just for him and his guidance, his work, or his
wisdom.
That is what I would say to a pupil of individualism in education. And
at the end I would remind him of Christ and His call after the children,
and of the new ideal of education, of panhumanism which stands over
individualism, and of the collective work of people which stands over
every individual work and merit.
EDUCATION AS AN INTERNATIONAL AFFAIR.
It is quite surprising and humiliating that other things can be discussed
and settled as international affairs, before education. Yet you have
hundreds of things regulated by international laws, and among these
hundred things education is net yet reckoned. You have the
International Institution of the Red Cross, international laws on trade,
fishery, travel, copyright, political crimes, barbarities in war-time, &c.
But this war shows quite clearly that education--before anything
else--should be a matter of international consideration and regulation.
Behold, how illusory are all international restrictions when the
education of a nation is quite excluded from any control! When the
Nitzschean education of Germany teaches the German youth to despise
all neighbours, all nations and races as inferior ones, how could you
expect the Germans to respect the laws and regulations about Belgium,
and submarines--and Zeppelin-warfare, and use of the dum-dum bullets
and of poisonous gases?
If there is anything to be learned from this war it is doubtless this: The
education of youth in all the countries of the world must become an
international affair of the very first importance.
THE RUSSIAN TSAR, MR. CARNEGIE AND NOBEL.
The Russian Tsar suggested the Peace Conference of The Hague. Mr.
Carnegie built a wonderful Hall of Peace there, formed several
commissions for the investigation of war cruelties during the Balkan
Wars, and founded many public libraries for the instruction of the poor.
The noble Nobel left his big fortune for the support of the best works of
literature or science having as their aim the general good of mankind. If
I were either the Russian Tsar or Mr. Carnegie or Professor Nobel I
would do neither of the three mentioned things, but I would give
suggestions and material support to an International Board of
Education.
That is the point to start with in the consolidation of the World. I am
sorry to say that no one of these three great friends of mankind listens
to the prophetic words of Christ: Let children come unto me! and that
no one thought that no great social reform and no real philanthropic
foundation of
Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.