The Marriage Contract | Page 3

this house, which I shall keep."
"Will you marry?"
"I will marry."
"I'm your friend, as you know, my old Paul," said de Marsay, after a
moment's silence, "and I say to you: settle down into a worthy father
and husband and you'll be ridiculous for the rest of your days. If you
could be happy and ridiculous, the thing might be thought of; but you
will not be happy. You haven't a strong enough wrist to drive a
household. I'll do you justice and say you are a perfect horseman; no
one knows as well as you how to pick up or thrown down the reins, and
make a horse prance, and sit firm to the saddle. But, my dear fellow,
marriage is another thing. I see you now, led along at a slapping pace
by Madame la Comtesse de Manerville, going whither you would not,
oftener at a gallop than a trot, and presently unhorsed!--yes, unhorsed
into a ditch and your legs broken. Listen to me. You still have some
forty-odd thousand francs a year from your property in the Gironde.
Good. Take your horses and servants and furnish your house in
Bordeaux; you can be king of Bordeaux, you can promulgate there the
edicts that we put forth in Paris; you can be the correspondent of our
stupidities. Very good. Play the rake in the provinces; better still,
commit follies; follies may win you celebrity. But--don't marry. Who
marries now-a-days? Only merchants, for the sake of their capital, or to
be two to drag the cart; only peasants who want to produce children to
work for them; only brokers and notaries who want a wife's 'dot' to pay
for their practice; only miserable kings who are forced to continue their
miserable dynasties. But we are exempt from the pack, and you want to
shoulder it! And why DO you want to marry? You ought to give your
best friend your reasons. In the first place, if you marry an heiress as
rich as yourself, eighty thousand francs a year for two is not the same
thing as forty thousand francs a year for one, because the two are soon
three or four when the children come. You haven't surely any love for

that silly race of Manerville which would only hamper you? Are you
ignorant of what a father and mother have to be? Marriage, my old Paul,
is the silliest of all the social immolations; our children alone profit by
it, and don't know its price until their horses are nibbling the flowers on
our grave. Do you regret your father, that old tyrant who made your
first years wretched? How can you be sure that your children will love
you? The very care you take of their education, your precautions for
their happiness, your necessary sternness will lessen their affection.
Children love a weak or a prodigal father, whom they will despise in
after years. You'll live betwixt fear and contempt. No man is a good
head of a family merely because he wants to be. Look round on all our
friends and name to me one whom you would like to have for a son.
We have known a good many who dishonor their names. Children, my
dear Paul, are the most difficult kind of merchandise to take care of.
Yours, you think, will be angels; well, so be it! Have you ever sounded
the gulf which lies between the lives of a bachelor and a married man?
Listen. As a bachelor you can say to yourself: 'I shall never exhibit
more than a certain amount of the ridiculous; the public will think of
me what I choose it to think.' Married, you'll drop into the infinitude of
the ridiculous! Bachelor, you can make your own happiness; you enjoy
some to-day, you do without it to-morrow; married, you must take it as
it comes; and the day you want it you will have to go without it. Marry,
and you'll grow a blockhead; you'll calculate dowries; you'll talk
morality, public and religious; you'll think young men immoral and
dangerous; in short, you'll become a social academician. It's pitiable!
The old bachelor whose property the heirs are waiting for, who fights to
his last breath with his nurse for a spoonful of drink, is blest in
comparison with a married man. I'm not speaking of all that will
happen to annoy, bore, irritate, coerce, oppose, tyrannize, narcotize,
paralyze, and idiotize a man in marriage, in that struggle of two beings
always in one another's presence, bound forever, who have coupled
each other under the strange impression that they were suited. No, to
tell you those things would be merely a repetition of Boileau, and we
know him by heart. Still, I'll forgive your absurd idea if