The Guardian Angel | Page 4

Oliver Wendell Holmes
will perhaps be pleased to turn backward and
learn what I have to say here.
This tale forms a natural sequence to a former one, which some may
remember, entitled "Elsie Venner." Like that,--it is intended for two
classes of readers, of which the smaller one includes the readers of the
"Morals" in Aesop and of this Preface.
The first of the two stories based itself upon an experiment which some
thought cruel, even on paper. It imagined an alien element introduced
into the blood of a human being before that being saw the light. It
showed a human nature developing itself in conflict with the ophidian
characteristics and instincts impressed upon it during the pre-natal
period. Whether anything like this ever happened, or was possible,
mattered little: it enabled me, at any rate, to suggest the limitations of
human responsibility in a simple and effective way.
The story which follows comes more nearly within the range of
common experience. The successive development of inherited bodily
aspects and habitudes is well known to all who have lived long enough
to see families grow up under their own eyes. The same thing happens,
but less obviously to common observation, in the mental and moral
nature. There is something frightful in the way in which not only
characteristic qualities, but particular manifestations of them, are
repeated from generation to generation. Jonathan Edwards the younger
tells the story of a brutal wretch in New Haven who was abusing his
father, when the old man cried out, "Don't drag me any further, for I did
n't drag my father beyond this tree." [The original version of this
often-repeated story may be found in Aristotle's Ethics, Book 7th,
Chapter 7th.] I have attempted to show the successive evolution of

some inherited qualities in the character of Myrtle Hazard, not so
obtrusively as to disturb the narrative, but plainly enough to be kept in
sight by the small class of preface-readers.
If I called these two stories Studies of the Reflex Function in its higher
sphere, I should frighten away all but the professors and the learned
ladies. If I should proclaim that they were protests against the
scholastic tendency to shift the total responsibility of all human action
from the Infinite to the finite, I might alarm the jealousy of the
cabinet-keepers of our doctrinal museums. By saying nothing about it,
the large majority of those whom my book reaches, not being
preface-readers, will never suspect anything to harm them beyond the
simple facts of the narrative.
Should any professional alarmist choose to confound the doctrine of
limited responsibility with that which denies the existence of any
self-determining power, he may be presumed to belong to the class of
intellectual half-breeds, of which we have many representatives in our
new country, wearing the garb of civilization, and even the gown of
scholarship. If we cannot follow the automatic machinery of nature into
the mental and moral world, where it plays its part as much as in the
bodily functions, without being accused of laying "all that we are evil
in to a divine thrusting on," we had better return at once to our old
demonology, and reinstate the Leader of the Lower House in his
time-honored prerogatives.
As fiction sometimes seems stranger than truth, a few words may be
needed here to make some of my characters and statements appear
probable. The long-pending question involving a property which had
become in the mean time of immense value finds its parallel in the
great De Haro land-case, decided in the Supreme Court while this story
was in progress (May 14th, 1867). The experiment of breaking the
child's will by imprisonment and fasting is borrowed from a famous
incident, happening long before the case lately before one of the courts
of a neighboring Commonwealth, where a little girl was beaten to death
because she would not say her prayers. The mental state involving utter
confusion of different generations in a person yet capable of forming a

correct judgment on other matters, is almost a direct transcript from
nature. I should not have ventured to repeat the questions of the
daughters of the millionaires to Myrtle Hazard about her family
conditions, and their comments, had not a lady of fortune and position
mentioned to me a similar circumstance in the school history of one of
her own children. Perhaps I should have hesitated in reproducing
Myrtle Hazard's "Vision," but for a singular experience of his own
related to me by the late Mr. Forceythe Willson.
Gifted Hopkins (under various alliasis) has been a frequent
correspondent of mine. I have also received a good many
communications, signed with various names, which must have been
from near female relatives of that young gentleman. I once sent a kind
of encyclical letter to
Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code

 / 158
Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.