"necessary truths," 
but mere empirical laws; in order to establish this view, self-consistent 
geometries were constructed upon assumptions other than those of
Euclid. In these geometries the sum of the angles of a triangle is not 
two right angles, and the departure from two right angles increases as 
the size of the triangle increases. It is often said that in non-Euclidean 
geometry space has a curvature, but this way of stating the matter is 
misleading, since it seems to imply a fourth dimension, which is not 
implied by these systems. 
Einstein supposes that space is Euclidean where it is sufficiently remote 
from matter, but that the presence of matter causes it to become slightly 
non-Euclidean--the more matter there is in the neighborhood, the more 
space will depart from Euclid. By the help of this hypothesis, together 
with his previous theory of relativity, he deduces gravitation--very 
approximately, but not exactly, according to the Newtonian law of the 
inverse square. The minute differences between the effects deduced 
from his theory and those deduced from Newton are measurable in 
certain cases. There are, so far, three crucial tests of the relative 
accuracy of the new theory and the old. 
(1) The perihelion of Mercury shows a discrepancy which has long 
puzzled astronomers. This discrepancy is fully accounted for by 
Einstein. At the time when he published his theory, this was its only 
experimental verification. 
(2) Modern physicists were willing to suppose that light might be 
subject to gravitation--i.e., that a ray of light passing near a great mass 
like the sun might be deflected to the extent to which a particle moving 
with the same velocity would be deflected according to the orthodox 
theory of gravitation. But Einstein's theory required that the light 
should be deflected just twice as much as this. The matter could only be 
tested during an eclipse among a number of bright stars. Fortunately a 
peculiarly favourable eclipse occurred last year. The results of the 
observations have now been published, and are found to verify 
Einstein's prediction. The verification is not, of course, quite exact; 
with such delicate observations that was not to be expected. In some 
cases the departure is considerable. But taking the average of the best 
series of observations, the deflection at the sun's limb is found to be 
1.98'', with a probable error of about 6 per cent., whereas the deflection 
calculated by Einstein's theory should be 1.75''. It will be noticed that 
Einstein's theory gave a deflection twice as large as that predicted by 
the orthodox theory, and that the observed deflection is slightly larger
than Einstein predicted. The discrepancy is well within what might be 
expected in view of the minuteness of the measurements. It is therefore 
generally acknowledged by astronomers that the outcome is a triumph 
for Einstein. 
(3) In the excitement of this sensational verification, there has been a 
tendency to overlook the third experimental test to which Einstein's 
theory was to be subjected. If his theory is correct as it stands, there 
ought, in a gravitational field, to be a displacement of the lines of the 
spectrum towards the red. No such effect has been discovered. 
Spectroscopists maintain that, so far as can be seen at present, there is 
no way of accounting for this failure if Einstein's theory in its present 
form is assumed. They admit that some compensating cause may be 
discovered to explain the discrepancy, but they think it far more 
probable that Einstein's theory requires some essential modification. 
Meanwhile, a certain suspense of judgment is called for. The new law 
has been so amazingly successful in two of the three tests that there 
must be some thing valid about it, even if it is not exactly right as yet. 
Einstein's theory has the very highest degree of aesthetic merit: every 
lover of the beautiful must wish it to be true. It gives a vast unified 
survey of the operations of nature, with a technical simplicity in the 
critical assumptions which makes the wealth of deductions astonishing. 
It is a case of an advance arrived at by pure theory: the whole effect of 
Einstein's work is to make physics more philosophical (in a good sense), 
and to restore some of that intellectual unity which belonged to the 
great scientific systems of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, but 
which was lost through increasing specialization and the overwhelming 
mass of detailed knowledge. In some ways our age is not a good one to 
live in, but for those who are interested in physics there are great 
compensations. 
 
THE EINSTEIN THEORY OF RELATIVITY 
A Concise Statement by Prof. H. A. Lorentz, of the University of 
Leyden 
The total eclipse of the sun of May 29, resulted in a striking 
confirmation of the new theory of the universal attractive power of 
gravitation    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
 
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.
	    
	    
