The Crime Against Europe | Page 3

Roger Casement
"the real crime against Germany," which explains everything but the
thing it set out to explain. It leaves unexplained the real crime against
Europe.
To explain the causes of the war we must find the causes of the
alliances of England, France and Russia against Germany.
For the cause of the war is that alliance--that and nothing else. The
defence of the Entente Cordiale is that it is an innocent pact of
friendship, designed only to meet the threat of the Triple Alliance. But
the answer to that is that whereas the Triple Alliance was formed thirty
years ago, it has never declared war on anyone, while the Triple
Entente before it is eight years old has involved Europe, America,
Africa, and Asia in a world conflict. We must find the motive for
England allying herself with France and Russia in an admittedly
anti-German "understanding" if we would understand the causes of the
present war and why it is that many besides Bernard Shaw hold that
"after having done all in our power to render war inevitable" it was idle
for the British Government to assume a death-bed solicitude for peace,
having already dug its grave and cast aside the shovel for the gun.

When that motive is apparent we shall realise who it was preferred war
to peace and how impossible it is to hope for any certain peace ensuing
from the victory of those who ensured an appeal to arms.
The Entente Cordiale, to begin with, is unnatural. There is nothing in
common between the parties to it, save antagonism to someone else. It
is wrongly named. It is founded not on predilections but on
prejudices--not on affection but on animosity. To put it crudely it is a
bond of hate not of love. None of the parties to it like or admire each
other, or have consistent aims, save one.
That satisfied, they will surely fall out among themselves, and the
greater the plunder derived from their victory the more certain their
ensuing quarrel.
Great Britain, in her dealings with most white people (not with all) is a
democracy.
Russia in her dealings with all, is an autocracy.
Great Britain is democratic in her government of herself and in her
dealings with the great white communities of Canada, Australia, New
Zealand, and South Africa. She is not democratic in her dealings with
subject races within the Empire--the Indians, notably, or the Irish. To
the Indians her rule is that of an absentee autocracy, differing in speech,
colour, religion and culture from those submitted to it by force; to the
Irish that of a resident autocracy bent on eliminating the people
governed from residence in their own country, and replacing them with
cattle for British consumption.
In both instances Britain is notably false to her professions of devotion
to democratic principles. Her affinity with Russia is found then, not in
the cases where her institutions are good, but in those where they are
bad.
An alliance founded on such grounds of contact can only produce evil.
To such it gave birth in Persia, to such it must give birth in the present

war.
In Persia we saw it betray the principles of democratic government,
destroy an infant constitution and disembowel the constitutionalists,
whilst it divided their country into "spheres of influence" and to-day we
see it harvesting with hands yet red with the blood of Persian patriots
the redder fruit of the seed then sown.
The alliance with France, while more natural than that with Russia if
we regard Great Britain as a democracy (by eliminating India, Egypt,
Ireland) had the same guilty end in view, and rests less on affinity of
aims than on affinity of antipathies.
The Entente Cordiale, the more closely we inspect it, we find is based
not on a cordial regard of the parties to it for each other, but on a
cordial disregard all three participants share for the party it is aimed
against.
It will be said that Germany must have done something to justify the
resentment that could bring about so strangely assorted a combination
against herself. What has been the crime of Germany against the
powers now assailing her? She has doubtless committed many crimes,
as have all the great powers, but in what respect has she so grievously
sinned against Europe that the Czar, the Emperor of India, the King of
Great Britain and Ireland, the Mikado and the President of the French
Republic--to say nothing of those minor potentates who like Voltaire's
minor prophets seem capable de tout--should now be pledged, by
irrevocable pact, to her destruction as a great power?
"German militarism," the reply that springs to the lips, is no more a
threat to civilisation than French or Russian militarism. It was born, not
of wars of
Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code

 / 50
Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.