The Communes Of Lombardy From The VI. To The X. Century

William Klapp Williams
랒The Communes Of Lombardy From The VI. To The X. Century - An Investigation Of The Causes Which Led To The Development Of Municipal Unity Among The Lombard Communes.

The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Communes Of Lombardy From The VI. To
The X. Century, by William Klapp Williams This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.net
Title: The Communes Of Lombardy From The VI. To The X. Century An Investigation Of The Causes Which Led To The Development Of Municipal Unity Among The Lombard Communes.
Author: William Klapp Williams
Release Date: April 26, 2004 [EBook #12162]
Language: English
Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK COMMUNES OF LOMBARDY ***

Produced by Keith Eckrich, Juliet Sutherland and PG Distributed Proofreaders

JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY STUDIES
IN
HISTORICAL AND POLITICAL SCIENCE
HERBERT B. ADAMS, Editor
History is past Politics and Politics present History.--Freeman
NINTH SERIES

V-VI
The Communes of Lombardy from the VI. to the X. Century
AN INVESTIGATION OF THE CAUSES WHICH LED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF MUNICIPAL UNITY AMONG THE LOMBARD COMMUNES
BY WILLIAM KLAPP WILLIAMS, PH.D.
NEWBERRY LIBRARY, CHICAGO
May, June, 1891
"Est error spretus, quo Langobarda juventus Errabat, verum loquitur nunc pagina sensum."
RHOTARI: Legum Prologus.
THE COMMUNES OF LOMBARDY FROM THE VI. TO THE X. CENTURY.

PART I.
THE LOMBARD CONQUEST AND ITS RESULTS.
Before tracing the beginnings of renewed municipal life in Northern Italy, we must consider the conditions of land and people, which first rendered possible and then fostered the spirit of local independence of which such beginnings were the natural expression. To do this we must commence our researches with the first domination of the Lombards in the country.
In detail the story of the conquest of Northern Italy by the Lombards under Alboin, in 568, hardly differs materially from that of the inroads of other barbarian tribes of the north on the fertile plains of Italy. The causes were the same. Where the distinction is to be found from other such invasions, is in the results of the Lombard occupation, and in the different methods which the Lombards adopted so as to render their power and their possessions permanent. Let us look at the character of this invading host, which sweeps like a tide, at once destroying and revivifying, over the exhausted though still fertile plains of the Po and the Adige. Are we to call it a moving people or an advancing army? Are we to call its leaders (_duces_, from ducere to lead), heads of clans and families, or captains and generals? Finally, is the land to be invaded, or is the land to be settled? To all these questions the only answer is to be found in the conception of the absolute union of both the kinds of functions described. A people is moving from a home whose borders have proved too narrow for its increasing numbers; an army is conquering a new home, where plenty will take the place of want, and luxury of privation. It is not an army marching at the command of a strongly centralized power to conquer a rich neighbor, and force a defeated enemy to pay it service or tribute. It is a body which, when it has conquered as an army, will occupy as a people; when it is established as a people, will still remain an army. The sword was not turned into the ploughshare; but the power to wield the sword had given the right to till the land, and soon the power to hold the land was to give the right to wear the sword. It was the conquest of a highly civilized agricultural people--whose very civilization had reduced them to a stage of moral weakness which rendered them totally unfit to defend themselves--by a semi-barbarous people, agricultural also, but rude, uncivilized, independent, owning no rulers but their family or military chiefs.
The conquerors took possession of the country simply as they would take possession of a larger farm than they had before owned. Their riches were only such as served for the support of men--herds, land, wine and corn. They needed cultivators for their large farm, so instead of destroying every one with fire and sword, they spared those of the weak inhabitants of the land who had survived the first onslaught, in order that they might make use of farmers to cultivate their new possessions. In most cases they did not make slaves of them, but tributaries; and after the land had been portioned evenly among the soldiers of the invading host, the original holders of the land tilled it themselves, under a system somewhat kindred to the metayer system as to-day existent in Tuscany and elsewhere, paying, according to the usual custom adopted by the northern
Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code

 / 39
Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.