The Call of the Twentieth Century | Page 7

the kind to which
he belonged--men who know nothing and care nothing for science and
its methods, who choose the medical school which will turn them loose
most quickly and cheaply, who have no feeling for their patients, and
whose prescriptions are given with no more conscience than goes into
the fabrication of an electric belt or the compounding of a patent
medicine. Room for no more doctors whose highest conception is to
look wise, take his chances, and pocket the fee. Room for no more
doctors just now, when the knowledge of human anatomy and
physiology has shown the way to a thousand uses of preventive surgery.
Room for no more doctors, when the knowledge of the microbes and

their germs has given the hope of successful warfare against all
contagious diseases; room for no more doctors, when antiseptics and
anaesthetics have proved their value in a thousand pain-saving ways.
Room for no more doctors now, when the doctor must be an honest
man, with a sound knowledge of the human body and a mastery of the
methods of the sciences on which this knowledge depends. Room for
no more doctors of the incompetent class, because the wiser times
demand a better service.
What is true in medicine applies also to the profession of law. The
pettifogger must give place to the jurist. The law is not a device for
getting around the statutes. It is the science and art of equity. The
lawyers of the future will not be mere pleaders before juries. They will
save their clients from need of judge or jury. In every civilized nation
the lawyers must be the law-givers. The sword has given place to the
green bag. The demands of the Twentieth Century will be that the
statutes coincide with equity. This condition educated lawyers can
bring about. To know equity is to be its defender.
In politics the demand for serious service must grow. As we have to do
with wise and clean men, statesmen, instead of vote-manipulators, we
shall feel more and more the need for them. We shall demand not only
men who can lead in action, but men who can prevent unwise action.
Often the policy which seems most attractive to the majority is full of
danger for the future. We need men who can face popular opinion, and,
if need be, to face it down. The best citizen is one not afraid to cast his
vote away by voting with the minority.
As we look at it in the rough, the political outlook of democracy often
seems discouraging. A great, rich, busy nation cannot stop to see who
grabs its pennies. We are plundered by the rich, we are robbed by the
poor, and trusts and unions play the tyrant over both. But all these evils
are temporary. The men that have solved greater problems in the past
will not be balked by these. Whatever is won for the cause of equity
and decency is never lost again. "Eternal vigilance is the price of
liberty," and in this Twentieth Century there are always plenty who are
awake. One by one political reforms take their place on our statute
books, and each one comes to stay.
In all this, the journalist of the future may find an honorable place. He
will learn to temper enterprise with justice, audacity with fidelity,

omniscience with truthfulness. When he does this he will become a
natural leader of men because he will be their real servant. To mould
public opinion, to furnish a truthful picture of the times from day to day,
either of these ideals in journalism gives ample room for the play of the
highest manly energy.
The need of the teacher will not grow less as the century goes on. The
history of the future is written in the schools of to-day, and the reform
which gives us better schools is the greatest of reforms. It is said that
the teacher's noblest work is to lead the child to his inheritance. This is
the inheritance he would win; the truth that men have tested in the past,
and the means by which they were led to know that it was truth. "Free
should the scholar be--free and brave," and to such as these the
Twentieth Century will bring the reward of the scholar.
The Twentieth Century will need its preachers and leaders in religion.
Some say, idly, that religion is losing her hold in these strenuous days.
But she is not. She is simply changing her grip. The religion of this
century will be more practical, more real. It will deal with the days of
the week as well as with the Sabbath. It will be as patent in the marts of
trade as in the walls of a cathedral, for