Sir Walter Scott | Page 6

The stubborn spearmen still made good Their dark impenetrable wood,
Each stepping where his comrade stood, The instant that he fell. No
thought was there of dastard flight; Link'd in the serried phalanx tight,
Groom fought like noble, squire like knight, As fearlessly and well; Till
utter darkness closed her wing O'er their thin host and wounded king.
And The Lady of the Lake is all that the Highlands meant for Scott at
that time. But Rokeby has little substance, though it includes more than
one of Scott's finest songs. The Lord of the Isles, though its battle is not
too far below Marmion, and though its hero is Robert the Bruce, yet
wants the original force of the earlier romances. When Scott changed
his hand from verse to prose for story-telling and wrote Waverley, he
not only gained in freedom and got room for a kind of dialogue that
was impossible in rhyme, but he came back to the same sort of
experience and the same strength of tradition as had given life to the
Lay. The time of Waverley was no more than sixty years since, when
Scott began to write it and mislaid and forgot the opening chapters in

1805; he got his ideas of the Forty-five from an old Highland
gentleman who had been out with the Highland clans, following the
lead of Prince Charles Edward, the Young Chevalier. The clans in that
adventure belonged to a world more ancient than that of Ivanhoe or The
Talisman; they also belonged so nearly to Scott's own time that he
heard their story from one of themselves. He had spoken and listened to
another gentleman who had known Rob Roy. The Bride of
Lammermoor came to him as the Icelandic family histories came to the
historians of Gunnar or Kjartan Olafsson. He had known the story all
his life, and he wrote it from tradition. The time of The Heart of
Midlothian is earlier than Waverley, but it is more of a modern novel
than an historical romance, and even Old Mortality, which is earlier
still, is modern also; Cuddie Headrigg is no more antique than Dandie
Dinmont or the Ettrick Shepherd himself, and even his mother and her
Covenanting friends are not far from the fashion of some enthusiasts of
Scott's own time--e.g. Hogg's religious uncle who could not be brought
to repeat his old ballads for thinking of 'covenants broken, burned and
buried.' Guy Mannering and The Antiquary are both modern stories: it
is not till Ivanhoe that Scott definitely starts on the regular historical
novel in the manner that was found so easy to imitate.
If Rob Roy is not the very best of them all--and on problems of that sort
perhaps the right word may be the Irish phrase Naboclish! ('don't
trouble about that!') which Scott picked up when he was visiting Miss
Edgeworth in Ireland--Rob Roy shows well enough what Scott could do,
in romance of adventure and in humorous dialogue. The plots of his
novels are sometimes thought to be loose and ill-defined, and he tells
us himself that he seldom knew where his story was carrying him. His
young heroes are sometimes reckoned rather feeble and featureless.
Francis Osbaldistone, like Edward Waverley and Henry Morton, drifts
into trouble and has his destiny shaped for him by other people and
accidents. But is this anything of a reproach to the author of the story?
Then it must tell against some novelists who seem to work more
conscientiously and carefully than Scott on the frame of their
story--against George Meredith in Evan Harrington and Richard
Feverel and Harry Richmond, all of whom are driven by circumstances
and see their way no more clearly than Scott's young men. Is it not

really the strength, not the weakness, of Scott's imagination that
engages us in the perplexities of Waverley and Henry Morton even to
the verge of tragedy--keeping out of tragedy because it is not his
business, and would spoil his looser, larger, more varied web of a story?
Francis Osbaldistone is less severely tried. His story sets him travelling,
and may we not admire the skill of the author who uses the old device
of a wandering hero with such good effect? The story is not a mere
string of adventures--it is adventures with a bearing on the main issue,
with complications that all tell in the end; chief among them, of course,
the successive appearances of Mr. Campbell and the counsels of Diana
Vernon. The scenes that bring out Scott's genius most completely--so
they have always seemed to me--are those of Francis Osbaldistone's
stay in Glasgow. Seldom has any novelist managed so easily so many
different modes of interest. There is the place--in different lights--the
streets, the river, the bridge, the Cathedral, the prison, seen