Shakespeares Bones | Page 8

an example of what I condemn, and should, in any actual
case, denounce as strongly as Mr. Philip Neve or George Steevens. To
expose a man's remains after any interval for the purpose of treating his
memory with indignity, or of denouncing an unpopular cause which he
espoused, or (worst of all) "to fine his bones," or make money by the
public exhibition of his dust, deserves unmeasured and unqualified
reprobation, and every prudent measure should be taken to render such
an act impossible.
To take another example of the reprehensible practice of despoiling the
grave of a great enemy: Oliver Cromwell was, as is proved by the most
reliable evidence, namely, that of a trustworthy eye- witness, buried on
the scene of his greatest achievement, the Field of Naseby. Some
Royalist Philister is said to have discovered, and stolen from its
resting-place, the embalmed head of the great Protector. It found its
way to London towards the end of the last century, where it was
exhibited at No. 5, Mead Court, Old Bond Street. {20} It is said to have
been acquired by Sir Joshua Reynolds in September, 1786, and to be
now or late in the collection of Mr. W. A. Wilkinson, of Beckenham. It
is recorded in one of the Additional Manuscripts in the British Museum,
under date April 21, 1813, that "an offer was made this morning to
bring it to Soho Square, to show it to Sir Joseph Banks, but he desired
to be excused from seeing THE REMAINS OF THE OLD
VILLANOUS REPUBLICAN, THE MENTION OF WHOSE VERY
NAME MAKES HIS BLOOD BOIL WITH INDIGNATION. The
same offer was made to Sir Joseph forty years ago, which he also
refused." What a charming specimen was Banks of the genus Tory! But
after all it is a comfort to think that on this occasion he was right: for
while this head was undoubtedly that which did duty for the Protector
at Tyburn, and was afterwards fixed on the top of Westminster Hall, it
was almost certainly not that of Oliver Cromwell: whose remains
probably still lie crumbling into dust in their unknown grave on Naseby
Field. {21a}

I give one more example of robbing the grave of an illustrious man,
through the superstition of many and the cupidity of one. Swedenborg
was buried in the vault of the Swedish Church in Prince's Square, on
April 5, 1772. In 1790, in order to determine a question raised in debate,
viz., whether Swedenborg were really dead and buried, his wooden
coffin was opened, and the leaden one was sawn across the breast. A
few days after, a party of Swedenborgians visited the vault. "Various
relics" (says White: Life of Swedenborg, 2nd ed., 1868, p. 675) "were
carried off: Dr. Spurgin told me he possessed the cartilage of an ear.
Exposed to the air, the flesh quickly fell to dust, and a skeleton was all
that remained for subsequent visitors. {21b} At a funeral in 1817,
Granholm, an officer in the Swedish Navy, seeing the lid of
Swedenborg's coffin loose, abstracted the skull, and hawked it about
amongst London Swedenborgians, but none would buy. Dr. Wahlin,
pastor of the Swedish Church, recovered what he supposed to be the
stolen skull, had a cast of it taken, and placed it in the coffin in 1819.
The cast which is sometimes seen in phrenological collections is
obviously not Swedenborg's: it is thought to be that of a small female
skull."
In the latter part of the reign of George III a mausoleum was built in the
Tomb House at Windsor Castle. On its completion, in the spring of
1813, it was determined to open a passage of communication with St.
George's Chapel, and in constructing this an opening was accidentally
made in one of the walls of the vault of Henry VIII, through which the
workmen could see three coffins, one of which was covered with a
black velvet pall. It was known that Henry VIII and Queen Jane
Seymour were buried in this vault, but a question had been raised as to
the place of Charles the First's interment, through the statement of Lord
Clarendon, that the search made for the late King's coffin at Windsor
(with a view to its removal to Westminster Abbey) had proved fruitless.
Sir Henry Halford, in his Account, appended to his Essays and Orations,
1831, {22} thus describes the examination of the palled coffin.
"On representing the circumstance to the Prince Regent, his R. H.
perceived at once that A DOUBTFUL POINT IN HISTORY MIGHT
BE CLEARED UP BY OPENING THIS VAULT; and accordingly his

R. H. ordered an examination to be made on the first convenient
opportunity. This was done on the First of April last [i.e., 1813], the
day after the funeral of