published without a title?'
`No. I found a title, at last. But I shan't tell you what it is,' as though I had been so
impertinent as to inquire. `I am not sure that it wholly satisfies me. But it is the best I can
find. It suggests something of the quality of the poems.... Strange growths, natural and
wild, yet exquisite,' he added, `and many- hued, and full of poisons.'
I asked him what he thought of Baudelaire. He uttered the snort that was his laugh, and
`Baudelaire,' he said, `was a bourgeois malgre lui.' France had had only one poet: Villon;
`and two- thirds of Villon were sheer journalism.' Verlaine was `an epicier malgre lui.'
Altogether, rather to my surprise, he rated French literature lower than English. There
were `passages' in Villiers de l'Isle-Adam. But `I,' he summed up, `owe nothing to
France.' He nodded at me. `You'll see,' he predicted.
I did not, when the time came, quite see that. I thought the author of `Fungoids'
did--unconsciously, of course--owe something to the young Parisian decadents, or to the
young English ones who owed something to THEM. I still think so. The little
book--bought by me in Oxford--lies before me as I write. Its pale grey buckram cover and
silver lettering have not worn well. Nor have its contents. Through these, with a
melancholy interest, I have again been looking. They are not much. But at the time of
their publication I had a vague suspicion that they MIGHT be. I suppose it is my capacity
for faith, not poor Soames' work, that is weaker than it once was....
TO A YOUNG WOMAN.
Thou art, who hast not been! Pale tunes irresolute And traceries of old sounds Blown
from a rotted flute Mingle with noise of cymbals rouged with rust, Nor not strange forms
and epicene Lie bleeding in the dust, Being wounded with wounds.
For this it is That in thy counterpart Of age-long mockeries Thou hast not been nor art!
There seemed to me a certain inconsistency as between the first and last lines of this. I
tried, with bent brows, to resolve the discord. But I did not take my failure as wholly
incompatible with a meaning in Soames' mind. Might it not rather indicate the depth of
his meaning? As for the craftsmanship, `rouged with rust' seemed to me a fine stroke, and
`nor not' instead of `and' had a curious felicity. I wondered who the Young Woman was,
and what she had made of it all. I sadly suspect that Soames could not have made more of
it than she. Yet, even now, if one doesn't try to make any sense at all of the poem, and
reads it just for the sound, there is a certain grace of cadence. Soames was an artist--in so
far as he was anything, poor fellow!
It seemed to me, when first I read `Fungoids,' that, oddly enough, the Diabolistic side of
him was the best. Diabolism seemed to be a cheerful, even a wholesome, influence in his
life.
NOCTURNE.
Round and round the shutter'd Square I stroll'd with the Devil's arm in mine. No sound
but the scrape of his hoofs was there And the ring of his laughter and mine. We had
drunk black wine.
I scream'd, `I will race you, Master!' `What matter,' he shriek'd, `to-night Which of us
runs the faster? There is nothing to fear to-night In the foul moon's light!'
Then I look'd him in the eyes, And I laugh'd full shrill at the lie he told And the gnawing
fear he would fain disguise. It was true, what I'd time and again been told: He was
old--old.
There was, I felt, quite a swing about that first stanza--a joyous and rollicking note of
comradeship. The second was slightly hysterical perhaps. But I liked the third: it was so
bracingly unorthodox, even according to the tenets of Soames' peculiar sect in the faith.
Not much `trusting and encouraging' here! Soames triumphantly exposing the Devil as a
liar, and laughing `full shrill,' cut a quite heartening figure, I thought--then! Now, in the
light of what befell, none of his poems depresses me so much as `Nocturne.'
I looked out for what the metropolitan reviewers would have to say. They seemed to fall
into two classes: those who had little to say and those who had nothing. The second class
was the larger, and the words of the first were cold; insomuch that
Strikes a note of modernity throughout.... These tripping numbers.--Preston Telegraph
was the only lure offered in advertisements by Soames' publisher. I had hopes that when
next I met the poet I could congratulate him on having made a stir; for I fancied he was
not so sure of his intrinsic greatness
Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.