it all in the preface to "Negations."'
`"Negations"?'
`Yes; I gave you a copy of it.'
`Oh yes, of course. But did you explain--for instance--that there was no such thing as bad
or good grammar?'
`N-no,' said Soames. `Of course in Art there is the good and the evil. But in Life--no.' He
was rolling a cigarette. He had weak white hands, not well washed, and with finger-tips
much stained by nicotine. `In Life there are illusions of good and evil, but'-- his voice
trailed away to a murmur in which the words `vieux jeu' and `rococo' were faintly audible.
I think he felt he was not doing himself justice, and feared that Rothenstein was going to
point out fallacies. Anyhow, he cleared his throat and said `Parlons d'autre chose.'
It occurs to you that he was a fool? It didn't to me. I was young, and had not the clarity of
judgment that Rothenstein already had. Soames was quite five or six years older than
either of us. Also, he had written a book.
It was wonderful to have written a book.
If Rothenstein had not been there, I should have revered Soames. Even as it was, I
respected him. And I was very near indeed to reverence when he said he had another
book coming out soon. I asked if I might ask what kind of book it was to be.
`My poems,' he answered. Rothenstein asked if this was to be the title of the book. The
poet meditated on this suggestion, but said he rather thought of giving the book no title at
all. `If a book is good in itself--' he murmured, waving his cigarette.
Rothenstein objected that absence of title might be bad for the sale of a book. `If,' he
urged, `I went into a bookseller's and said simply "Have you got?" or "Have you a copy
of?" how would they know what I wanted?'
`Oh, of course I should have my name on the cover,' Soames answered earnestly. `And I
rather want,' he added, looking hard at Rothenstein, `to have a drawing of myself as
frontispiece.' Rothenstein admitted that this was a capital idea, and mentioned that he was
going into the country and would be there for some time. He then looked at his watch,
exclaimed at the hour, paid the waiter, and went away with me to dinner. Soames
remained at his post of fidelity to the glaucous witch.
`Why were you so determined not to draw him?' I asked.
`Draw him? Him? How can one draw a man who doesn't exist?'
`He is dim,' I admitted. But my mot juste fell flat. Rothenstein repeated that Soames was
non-existent.
Still, Soames had written a book. I asked if Rothenstein had read `Negations.' He said he
had looked into it, `but,' he added crisply, `I don't profess to know anything about
writing.' A reservation very characteristic of the period! Painters would not then allow
that any one outside their own order had a right to any opinion about painting. This law
(graven on the tablets brought down by Whistler from the summit of Fujiyama) imposed
certain limitations. If other arts than painting were not utterly unintelligible to all but the
men who practised them, the law tottered--the Monroe Doctrine, as it were, did not hold
good. Therefore no painter would offer an opinion of a book without warning you at any
rate that his opinion was worthless. No one is a better judge of literature than Rothenstein;
but it wouldn't have done to tell him so in those days; and I knew that I must form an
unaided judgment on `Negations.'
Not to buy a book of which I had met the author face to face would have been for me in
those days an impossible act of self- denial. When I returned to Oxford for the Christmas
Term I had duly secured `Negations.' I used to keep it lying carelessly on the table in my
room, and whenever a friend took it up and asked what it was about I would say `Oh, it's
rather a remarkable book. It's by a man whom I know.' Just `what it was about' I never
was able to say. Head or tail was just what I hadn't made of that slim green volume. I
found in the preface no clue to the exiguous labyrinth of contents, and in that labyrinth
nothing to explain the preface.
`Lean near to life. Lean very near--nearer.
`Life is web, and therein nor warp nor woof is, but web only.
`It is for this I am Catholick in church and in thought, yet do let swift Mood weave there
what the shuttle of Mood wills.'
These were the opening phrases of the preface, but those which followed were less
Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.