R F Murray: His Poems with a Memoir by Andrew Lang | Page 7

on!' O Paian, Healer,?Then but for thee I must have died,?Beloved Peeler!
The following presentiment, though he was no `waster,' may very well have been his own. He was only half Scotch, and not at all metaphysical:-
THE WASTER'S PRESENTIMENT
I shall be spun. There is a voice within?Which tells me plainly I am all undone;?For though I toil not, neither do I spin,?I shall be spun.
April approaches. I have not begun?Schwegler or Mackintosh, nor will begin?Those lucid works till April 21.
So my degree I do not hope to win,?For not by ways like mine degrees are won;?And though, to please my uncle, I go in,?I shall be spun.
Here we must quote, from The Scarlet Gown, one of his most tender pieces of affectionate praise bestowed on his favourite city:-
A DECEMBER DAY
Blue, blue is the sea to-day,?Warmly the light?Sleeps on St. Andrews Bay -?Blue, fringed with white.
That's no December sky!?Surely `tis June?Holds now her state on high,?Queen of the noon.
Only the tree-tops bare?Crowning the hill,?Clear-cut in perfect air,?Warn us that still
Winter, the aged chief,?Mighty in power,?Exiles the tender leaf,?Exiles the flower.
Is there a heart to-day,?A heart that grieves?For flowers that fade away,?For fallen leaves?
Oh, not in leaves or flowers?Endures the charm?That clothes those naked towers?With love-light warm.
O dear St. Andrews Bay,?Winter or Spring?Gives not nor takes away?Memories that cling
All round thy girdling reefs,?That walk thy shore,?Memories of joys and griefs?Ours evermore.
`I have NOT worked for my classes this session,' he writes (1884), `and shall not take any places.' The five or six most distinguished pupils used, at least in my time, to receive prize-books decorated with the University's arms. These prize-men, no doubt, held the `places' alluded to by Murray. If HE was idle, `I speak of him but brotherly,' having never held any `place' but that of second to Mr. Wallace, now Professor of Moral Philosophy at Oxford, in the Greek Class (Mr. Sellar's). Why was one so idle, in Latin (Mr. Shairp), in Morals (Mr. Ferrier), in Logic (Mr. Veitch)? but Logic was unintelligible.
`I must confess,' remarks Murray, in a similar spirit of pensive regret, `that I have not had any ambition to distinguish myself either in Knight's (Moral Philosophy) or in Butler's.' {1}
Murray then speaks with some acrimony about earnest students, whose motive, he thinks, is a small ambition. But surely a man may be fond of metaphysics for the sweet sake of Queen Entelechy, and, moreover, these students looked forward to days in which real work would bear fruit.
`You must grind up the opinions of Plato, Aristotle, and a lot of other men, concerning things about which they knew nothing, and we know nothing, taking these opinions at second or third hand, and never looking into the works of these men; for to a man who wants to take a place, there is no time for anything of that sort.'
Why not? The philosophers ought to be read in their own language, as they are now read. The remarks on the most fairy of?philosophers--Plato; on the greatest of all minds, that of?Aristotle, are boyish. Again `I speak but brotherly,' remembering an old St. Leonard's essay in which Virgil was called `the furtive Mantuan,' and another, devoted to ridicule of Euripides. But Plato and Aristotle we never blasphemed.
Murray adds that he thinks, next year, of taking the highest Greek Class, and English Literature. In the latter, under Mr. Baynes, he took the first place, which he mentions casually to Mrs. Murray about a year after date:-
`A sweet life and an idle?He lives from year to year,?Unknowing bit or bridle,?There are no Proctors here.'
In Greek, despite his enthusiastic admiration of the professor, Mr. Campbell, he did not much enjoy himself:-
`Thrice happy are those?Who ne'er heard of Greek Prose -?Or Greek Poetry either, as far as that goes;?For Liddell and Scott?Shall cumber them not,?Nor Sargent nor Sidgwick shall break their repose.
But I, late at night,?By the very bad light?Of very bad gas, must painfully write?Some stuff that a Greek?With his delicate cheek?Would smile at as `barbarous'--faith, he well might.

So away with Greek Prose,?The source of my woes!?(This metre's too tough, I must draw to a close.)?May Sargent be drowned?In the ocean profound,?And Sidgwick be food for the carrion crows!'
Greek prose is a stubborn thing, and the biographer remembers being told that his was `the best, with the worst mistakes'; also frequently by Mr. Sellar, that it was `bald.' But Greek prose is splendid practice, and no less good practice is Greek and Latin verse. These exercises, so much sneered at, are the Dwellers on the Threshold of the life of letters. They are haunting forms of fear, but they have to be wrestled with, like the Angel (to change the figure), till they bless you, and make words become, in your hands, like the clay of the modeller. Could we write Greek like