Poetical Works of Edmund Waller and Sir John Denham | Page 4

Saccharissa-like the sun had set in the west, had risen like the moon in
the east of her lover's admiration, and soon, although only for a short
time, possessed the sky alone. This was his Amoret, who is said to have
been Lady Sophia Murray. The Juliet, however, was not one whit more
placable than the Rosalind-- she, too, rejected his suit; and this
rejection threw Waller, not into despair or melancholy, but into a wide
sea of miscellaneous flirtations, with we know not how many Chlorises,
Sylvias, Phyllises, and Flavias, all which names stood, it seems, for real
persons, and testified to a universality in the poet's affections which is
rather ludicrous than edifying. His heart was as soft, and shallower than
his verse.
Saccharissa married Lord Spencer, afterwards the Earl of Sunderland,
who was killed at the battle of Newbury. After his death, she was
united to a Mr. Robert Smythe; and she now lies at Brinton, in
Northamptonshire, while her picture continues, from the walls of the
gallery at Penshurst, to shed down the soft, languishing, and voluptuous
smile which had captivated the passions, if it could hardly be said to
have really touched the heart, of her poetical admirer. He not very long
after his twofold rejection, consoled himself by marrying a second wife.
Her name was Breaux or Bresse; and all we know of her is, that she

bore and brought up a great many children.
In 1639, the urgencies of the times compelled Charles to call a new
parliament, and it was decreed that politics instead of love and song
should now for a time engross our poet. And there opened up to him
unquestionably a noble field of patriotic exertion had he been fully
adapted for its cultivation--his firmness been equal to his eloquence,
and his sincerity to his address--had he been more of a Whig in the
good old Hampden sense, and less of a trimmer. As it is, he cuts, on the
whole, a doubtful figure, and is no great favourite with the partisans of
either of the great contending parties. He was again elected member for
Agmondesham, and when the question came before the House, whether
the supplies demanded by Strafford should be granted, or the
grievances complained of by the Commons should be first redressed,
he delivered an oration, trying with considerable dexterity to steer a
medium course between the two sides. In this speech, while contending
for the constitutional principle advocated by the Commons, and
expressing great attachment to his Majesty's person, he maintained that
the chief blame of the king's obnoxious measures lay with his clerical
advisers, and concluded by moving that the House should first consider
the grievances, and then grant the royal demand. Charles, who had
personally requested Waller to second the motion for instantly granting
the supplies, was not, we imagine, particularly pleased with his
"volunteer" laureate's conduct; and his temporary defection did not tend
to allay the royal fury at the parliament, which burst out forthwith in an
act of sudden and wrathful dismissal.
This session, called from its extreme brevity the Short Parliament,
ended in May. In November met that memorable assembly, destined
not to separate till it had outlived a monarchy and a hierarchy, and seen
a brewer's son take the sceptre instead of the descendant of a hundred
kings, the Long Parliament. Waller, again member for Agmondesham,
had made himself popular by his speech in the beginning of the year,
and was chosen by the Commons to manage the prosecution of Judge
Crawley for advising the levy of ship-money. He conducted the case
with talent, acuteness, and moderation. Soon after, however, as the
gulph widened between the king and the parliament, his position
became extremely awkward. His understanding on the whole was with
the parliament, although he did not approve of some of their measures,

but his heart was with the royal cause. He first of all, along with a
others (whose example was imitated by Fox and his party during the
French Revolution), retired from parliament, but in consequence of the
permission or request of the king, he speedily resumed his seat. When
Charles put himself in a warlike attitude in August 1642, Waller sent
him a present of a thousand broad pieces. Still his plausible language,
the tone of moderation which he preserved, and his connexion with
Cromwell and Hampden, rendered the popular party unwilling to
believe him a traitor to their cause, and he was appointed, after the
battle at Edgehill, one of the commissioners who met at Oxford to treat
of peace. Here, it is said, that one of those compliments which cost the
subtle Charles so little (Waller was last in being presented to the king,
and his Majesty told him, "Though last, you are not the