was more from
fear than vindictiveness. For Shoe Joe was suspected of being a trick
negro, and of possessing the power so to trick his work as to cause the
death of any one wearing his products. Nothing was productive of more
evil upon a plantation than was the existence upon it of a "Trick" or
"Goomer" negro; and so insidious was their influence, and so secret
their machinations, that, though suspected, it was impossible to prove
anything, for, although detested by their fellows, fear kept the latter
silent. Nothing would cause such abject terror as the discovery of an
odd-looking bundle, wrapped and wrapped with strands of horse-hair,
secreted beneath the steps, or laid in an accustomed path. Instantly after
such a discovery the person for whom it was meant would begin to pine
away, and, unless some counter spell were discovered, death would
ensue. These occurrences, fortunately, were rare, but if the thing once
took root upon a plantation, it wrought much evil in various ways. Joe
was suspected of these evil practices, and, though a wonderfully
capable man at all kinds of work, and a most accomplished courtier,
was always looked upon with suspicion. His death was sudden, and the
people firmly believed that he had made a compact with the devil, that
the term had expired, and that Satan had met him in the woods and
broken his neck. He was a tall, finely formed man, as black as ebony,
and his movements always reminded me of a serpent.
Negroes, even in these days of school education, retain many of their
superstitions, though ashamed to own it. One of their beliefs was that
the word you meant the devil's wife, and it was insulting to address any
one by that word. To one another it was always yinna. So marked was
this custom that the negroes of that section were known as the yinna
negroes. This word, though, was never used toward their superiors,
who were invariably addressed in the third person. Manuel was rather a
common name among them; there were always two or three Manuels
upon every plantation, and one was always called "Hoodie Manuel."
No one could ever discover what this meant; perhaps they did not know
themselves, though I am rather inclined to think that it was a
superstitious observance, understood, perhaps, only by a select few. I
think it must have had some sort of significance, as it was never
omitted. As soon as one Hoodie Manuel died, another Manuel assumed
the title, though not always the oldest.
It was not required of a woman with a large family to do field work.
Such women had their regular tasks of spinning allotted to them,
sufficiently light to allow ample time to take care of their houses and
children. The younger women (unless delicate) left their children in a
day nursery in charge of an elderly woman who was caretaker. Usually
they preferred field work, as being more lively; but if one disliked it,
she usually soon contrived to be classed among the spinners.
When, occasionally, I happened to go to any of the houses, often quite
unexpectedly, I can assert truthfully that I never, in a single instance,
saw dirt or squalor in one of them. The floors were clean, the beds
comfortable, with white and wonderfully clean blankets. Everything,
though very homely, with clumsy benches and tables, looked white and
thoroughly clean. I remember hearing your grandfather speak of once
going at breakfast time to a house to visit a sick child. The man of the
house was seated at a small table while his wife served him. The table
was covered with an immaculately clean homespun cloth, and coffee,
in a tin pot shining with scrubbing, either sugar or molasses, I forget
which, a dish of beautifully fried bacon and hoe-cakes, fresh from the
fire, constituted his plain but most abundant meal.
Separation of families has ever been a favorite plea for the abolition of
slavery, and I admit that in theory it was a plausible argument; and
justice compels me to say that such instances, though rare, were not
unknown. As a rule, however, family ties were respected, and when,
through the settlement of an estate, such separations seemed impending,
they were usually prevented by some agreement between the parties;
for instance, if a negro man had married a woman belonging to another
planter, a compromise was generally effected by the purchase of one of
the parties, regardless of self-interest on the part of the owners. Thus
families were kept together without regard to any pecuniary loss.
Public sentiment was against the severing of family ties.
Before I close this little sketch I will tell you as well as I can the outline
of plantation work.
With the beginning of
Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.