Notes and Queries, Number 36, July 6, 1850 | Page 3

of a word signifying a loud sound, and fame, or rumor, in "nisus"; not even _struggle_, in the sense of _contention_, an endeavour an effort, a strain.
SAMUEL HICKSON.
St. John's Wood, June 15, 1850.
[Footnote 1: I do not think it necessary, here, to defend my pronunciation of German; the expressions I now use being sufficient for the purpose of my argument. I passed over CH.'s observation on this subject, because it did not appear to me to touch the question.]
* * * * *
MORE BORROWED THOUGHTS.
O many are the poets that are sown By nature men endowed with highest gifts, The vision and the facility divine, Yet wanting the accomplishment of verse, Nor having e'er, as life advanced, been led by circumstance to take the height, The measure of themselves, &c.
Wordsworth's _Excursion_, B. i.
This admired passage has its prototype in the following from the _Lettere di Battista Guarini_, who points to a thought of similar kind in Dante:--
"O quante nolili ingegni si perdono che riuscerebbe mirabili [in poesia] se dal seguir le inchinazione loro non fossero, ò dà loro appetiti ò da i Padri loro sviati."
Coleridge, in his _Bibliographia Literaria_, 1st ed., vol. i. p. 28., relates a story of some one who desired {83} to be introduced to him, but hesitated because he asserted that he had written an epigram on "The Ancient Mariner," which Coleridge had himself written and inserted in _The Morning Post_, to this effect:--
"Your poem must eternal be Dear Sir! it cannot fail; For 'tis incomprehensible, And without head or tail."
This was, however, only a Gadshill robbery,--stealing stolen goods. The following epigram is said to be by Mr. Hole, in a MS. collection made by Spence (penes me), and it appeared first in print in _Terr? Filius_, from whence Dr. Salter copied it in his _Confusion worse Confounded_, p. 88:--
"Thy verses are eternal, O my friend! For he who reads them, reads them to no end."
In _The Crypt_, a periodical published by the late Rev. P. Hall, vol. i. p. 30., I find the following attributed to Coleridge, but I know not on what authority, as it does not appear among his collected poems:--
JOB'S LUCK, BY S. T. COLERIDGE, ESQ.
"Sly Beelzebub took all occasions To try Job's constancy and patience; He took his honours, took his health, He took his children, took his wealth, His camels, horses, asses, cows,-- Still the sly devil did not take his spouse. "But heav'n, that brings out good from evil, And likes to disappoint the devil, Had predetermined to restore Two-fold of all Job had before, His children, camels, asses, cows,-- Short-sighted devil, not to take his spouse."
This is merely an amplified version of the 199th epigram of the 3d Book of Owen:
"Divitias Jobo, sobolemque, ipsamque salutem Abstulit (hoc Domino non prohibens) Satan. Omnibus ablatis, miserò, tamen una superstes, Quae magis afflictum redderet, uxor erat."
Of this there are several imitations in French, three of which are given in the _Epigrammes Choisies d'Owen_, par M. de Kerivalant, published by Labouisse at Lyons in 1819.
S.W. SINGER.
Mickleham, 1850.
* * * * *
STRANGERS IN THE HOUSE OF COMMONS.
(Vol. ii., p. 17.)
As far as my observation extends, i.e. the last thirty-one years, no alteration has taken place in the practice of the House of Commons with respect to the admission of strangers. In 1844 the House adopted the usual sessional order regarding strangers, which I transcribe, inserting within brackets the only material words added by Mr. Christie in 1845:--
"That the Serjeant-at-Arms attending this house do, from time to time, take into his custody any stranger or strangers that he shall see or be informed of to be in the house or gallery [appropriated to the members of this house, and also any stranger who, having been admitted into any other part of the house or gallery, shall misconduct himself, or shall not withdraw when strangers are directed to withdraw] while the House or any committee of the whole House is sitting, and that no person so taken into custody be discharged out of custody without the special order of the House.
"That no member of the House do presume to bring any stranger or strangers into the house, or the gallery thereof, while the House is sitting."
This order appears to have been framed at a time when there was no separate gallery exclusively appropriated to strangers, and when they were introduced by members into the gallery of what is called the "body of the house." This state of things had passed away: and for a long series of years strangers had been admitted to a gallery in the House of Commons in the face of the sessional order, by which your correspondent CH. imagines their presence was "absolutely prohibited."
When I speak of strangers being admitted, it must not be supposed that this was done by order