not have been asked by any greater 
man in this world, nor granted by any less. Had no other distinction 
settled upon Kate, this would have been enough to fix the gaze of her 
own nation. But her whole life constituted Kate's supreme distinction. 
There can be no doubt, therefore, that, from the year 1624 (that is, the 
last year of our James I.), she became the object of an admiration in her 
own country that was almost idolatrous. And this admiration was not of 
a kind that rested upon any partisan-schism amongst her countrymen. 
So long as it was kept alive by her bodily presence amongst them, it 
was an admiration equally aristocratic and popular,--shared alike by the 
rich and the poor, by the lofty and the humble. Great, therefore, would 
be the demand for her portrait. There is a tradition that Velasquez, who 
had in 1623 executed a portrait of Charles I. (then Prince of Wales), 
was amongst those who in the three or four following years ministered 
to this demand. It is believed, also, that, in travelling from Genoa and 
Florence to Rome, she sat to various artists, in order to meet the interest 
about herself already rising amongst the cardinals and other dignitaries 
of the Romish church. It is probable, therefore, that numerous pictures 
of Kate are yet lurking both in Spain and Italy, but not known as such. 
For, as the public consideration granted to her had grown out of merits
and qualities purely personal, and was kept alive by no local or family 
memorials rooted in the land, or surviving herself, it was inevitable that, 
as soon as she herself died, all identification of her portraits would 
perish: and the portraits would thenceforwards be confounded with the 
similar memorials, past all numbering, which every year accumulates 
as the wrecks from household remembrances of generations that are 
passing or passed, that are fading or faded, that are dying or buried. It is 
well, therefore, amongst so many irrecoverable ruins, that, in the 
portrait at Aix-la-Chapelle, we still possess one undoubted 
representation (and therefore in some degree a means for identifying 
other representations) of a female so memorably adorned by nature; 
gifted with capacities so unparalleled both of doing and suffering; who 
lived a life so stormy, and perished by a fate so unsearchably 
mysterious. 
 
THE ORPHAN HEIRESS 
I. 
VISIT TO LAXTON. 
 
My route, after parting from Lord Westport at Birmingham, lay, as I 
have mentioned in the "Autobiographic Sketches," through Stamford to 
Laxton, the Northamptonshire seat of Lord Carbery. From Stamford, 
which I had reached by some intolerable old coach, such as in those 
days too commonly abused the patience and long-suffering of Young 
England, I took a post-chaise to Laxton. The distance was but nine 
miles, and the postilion drove well, so that I could not really have been 
long upon the road; and yet, from gloomy rumination upon the unhappy 
destination which I believed myself approaching within three or four 
months, never had I weathered a journey that seemed to me so long and 
dreary. As I alighted on the steps at Laxton, the first dinner-bell rang; 
and I was hurrying to my toilet, when my sister Mary, who had met me 
in the portico, begged me first of all to come into Lady Carbery's 
[Footnote: Lady Carbery.--"To me, individually, she was the one sole 
friend that ever I could regard as entirely fulfilling the offices of an 
honest friendship. She had known me from infancy; when I was in my 
first year of life, she, an orphan and a great heiress, was in her tenth or
eleventh."--See closing pages of "Autobiographic Sketches."] 
dressing-room, her ladyship having something special to communicate, 
which related (as I understood her) to one Simon. "What Simon? Simon 
Peter?"--O, no, you irreverend boy, no Simon at all with an S, but 
Cymon with a C,--Dryden's Cymon,-- 
"That whistled as he went for want of thought.'" 
This one indication was a key to the whole explanation that followed. 
The sole visitors, it seemed, at that time to Laxton, beside my sister and 
myself, were Lord and Lady Massey. They were understood to be 
domesticated at Laxton for a very long stay. In reality, my own private 
construction of the case (though unauthorized by anything ever hinted 
to me by Lady Carbery) was, that Lord Massey might probably be 
under some cloud of pecuniary embarrassments, such as suggested 
prudentially an absence from Ireland. Meantime, what was it that made 
him an object of peculiar interest to Lady Carbery? It was the singular 
revolution which, in one whom all his friends looked upon as sold to 
constitutional torpor, suddenly, and beyond all hope, had kindled a new 
and nobler life. Occupied originally by no shadow of any earthly 
interest, killed by    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.