Memoirs of a Cavalier | Page 4

name of a
person of so much gallantry and honour, and so many ways valuable to
the world, should be lost to the readers. We assure them no small
labour has been thrown away upon the inquiry, and all we have been
able to arrive to of discovery in this affair is, that a memorandum was
found with this manuscript, in these words, but not signed by any name,
only the two letters of a name, which gives us no light into the matter,
which memoir was as follows:--
Memorandum.
"I found this manuscript among my father's writings, and I understand
that he got them as plunder, at, or after, the fight at Worcester, where
he served as major of ----'s regiment of horse on the side of the
Parliament. I.K."
As this has been of no use but to terminate the inquiry after the person,
so, however, it seems most naturally to give an authority to the original
of the work, viz., that it was born of a soldier; and indeed it is through
every part related with so soldierly a style, and in the very language of
the field, that it seems impossible anything but the very person who
was present in every action here related, could be the relater of them.

The accounts of battles, the sieges, and the several actions of which this
work is so full, are all recorded in the histories of those times; such as
the great battle of Leipsic, the sacking of Magdeburg, the siege of
Nuremburg, the passing the river Lech in Bavaria; such also as the
battle of Kineton, or Edgehill, the battles of Newbury, Marston Moor,
and Naseby, and the like: they are all, we say, recorded in other
histories, and written by those who lived in those times, and perhaps
had good authority for what they wrote. But do those relations give any
of the beautiful ideas of things formed in this account? Have they one
half of the circumstances and incidents of the actions themselves that
this man's eyes were witness to, and which his memory has thus
preserved? He that has read the best accounts of those battles will be
surprised to see the particulars of the story so preserved, so nicely and
so agreeably described, and will confess what we allege, that the story
is inimitably told; and even the great actions of the glorious King
GUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS receive a lustre from this man's relations
which the world was never made sensible of before, and which the
present age has much wanted of late, in order to give their affections a
turn in favour of his late glorious successor.
In the story of our own country's unnatural wars, he carries on the same
spirit. How effectually does he record the virtues and glorious actions
of King Charles the First, at the same time that he frequently enters
upon the mistakes of his Majesty's conduct, and of his friends, which
gave his enemies all those fatal advantages against him, which ended in
the overthrow of his armies, the loss of his crown and life, and the ruin
of the constitution!
In all his accounts he does justice to his enemies, and honours the merit
of those whose cause he fought against; and many accounts recorded in
his story, are not to be found even in the best histories of those times.
What applause does he give to gallantry of Sir Thomas Fairfax, to his
modesty, to his conduct, under which he himself was subdued, and to
the justice he did the king's troops when they laid down their arms!
His description of the Scots troops in the beginning of the war, and the
behaviour of the party under the Earl of Holland, who went over

against them, are admirable; and his censure of their conduct, who
pushed the king upon the quarrel, and then would not let him fight, is
no more than what many of the king's friends (though less knowing as
soldiers) have often complained of.
In a word, this work is a confutation of many errors in all the writers
upon the subject of our wars in England, and even in that extraordinary
history written by the Earl of Clarendon; but the editors were so just
that when, near twenty years ago, a person who had written a whole
volume in folio, by way of answer to and confutation of Clarendon's
"History of the Rebellion," would have borrowed the clauses in this
account, which clash with that history, and confront it,--we say the
editors were so just as to refuse them.
There can be nothing objected against the general credit of this work,
seeing its truth is established upon universal history; and almost all the
facts, especially those of moment, are confirmed for their general