Memoirs of Sir Wemyss Reid 1842-1885 | Page 4

Wemyss Reid
as Mr. Morley somewhat drily states in his
biography, "reckoned on a proper stoicism in the victims of public
necessity," and I suppose my brother was regarded as thin-skinned, but
a man may be forgiven a measure of sensitiveness when his honour is
impeached.
He always used to speak with gratitude of the action of Lord Russell of
Killowen at that period. He heard the gossip of the clubs, and was not
content, like the majority of men, either to believe it or to dismiss the
matter with a shrug of the shoulders. He sought my brother out at his
own house, heard the whole story from his own lips--through an
informal but stringent process of cross-examination--drew his own
conclusions, and did more than anyone else to turn the tide of
misrepresentation. Lord Russell never rested until Wemyss Reid was
elected an honorary member of the Eighty Club, a distinction shared by
only two or three persons, and one which did not a little to bring about,
in the Liberal party at least, a quick reversal of public opinion. The
chivalrous action of Lord Russell was all the more creditable as the two
men at the time were only slightly acquainted. Other honours came to
my brother within the next two years. The University of St. Andrews in
1893 conferred upon him the degree of LL.D., and in the following
year he was knighted "for services to Letters and Politics."

It is a pleasure to hark back to the literary interests which grew around
the later years of my brother in London. He went thither in 1887 to take
control of the business of Messrs. Cassell & Company--a position of
wide influence and hard work which he retained to the last day of his
life. He used to tell me that he detested the City and the irksomeness of
keeping office hours, but he stuck manfully to his post, and his
presence at the desk there lent a lustre even to the traditions of a great
publishing house. I betray no confidences when I say that at first he
found his new duties somewhat uncongenial. He had won his spurs as a
journalist, he was fond of the cut and thrust of party politics, he missed
the rush of public life, and he felt that perhaps he had been ill-advised
in quitting the editorial saddle. But this feeling of depression quickly
wore off when he set himself, with characteristic energy, to master the
details of his new work, though to the last he often cast longing glances
backwards to the years in which he inspired the policy of a great daily
newspaper. Before he left Leeds--and here I may say that he did not
leave without substantial proof of the esteem in which he was held--he
accepted two literary commissions, either of which would have
satisfied most men and absorbed all their energies for a term of years.
One was the preparation of an authoritative biography of Mr. Forster,
the other a similar work--less political and more literary--on the first
Lord Houghton. He was, of course, in a position to speak from close
personal knowledge of both men, and in each case all their private
letters and papers were placed at his discretion. He found relief from
the prosaic details of a business career in these congenial tasks, if such
a term is applicable to what in reality were labours of love. Both were
big books, and the marvel is how, with all that he had in hand at the
time, he contrived to write them. But the passion for work was the zest
of his life, and it was never turned to more admirable account than in
these labours. "The Life of the Right Hon. W. E. Forster" was
published in 1888, and "The Life, Letters, and Friendships of Lord
Houghton" in 1890, and both met with a reception which it is hardly
within my province to describe. It is enough to say that they widened
his reputation, added materially to his influence, and, best of all,
brought him many new and powerful friends.
Almost before he had finished writing the second of these books, at the
instance of Mr. Bryce (with whom his relations were always most close

and cordial) and other well-known men in the Liberal party, he, in
conjunction with Sir John Brunner, founded the _Speaker_, a weekly
journal which was started on similar lines to the _Spectator_, but
devoted to the advocacy of the Home Rule cause, and broadly of the
policy of Mr. Gladstone. The first number was published on January
4th, 1890, and from that time until October, 1899, he alone was
responsible for its editorial control. He gathered around him a brilliant
staff of contributors; he used laughingly to say that he was
over-weighted
Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code

 / 155
Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.