of some like action past, and the events thereof one 
after another; supposing like events will follow like actions. As he that 
foresees what wil become of a Criminal, re-cons what he has seen 
follow on the like Crime before; having this order of thoughts, The 
Crime, the Officer, the Prison, the Judge, and the Gallowes. Which 
kind of thoughts, is called Foresight, and Prudence, or Providence; and 
sometimes Wisdome; though such conjecture, through the difficulty of 
observing all circumstances, be very fallacious. But this is certain; by 
how much one man has more experience of things past, than another; 
by so much also he is more Prudent, and his expectations the seldomer 
faile him. The Present onely has a being in Nature; things Past have a 
being in the Memory onely, but things To Come have no being at all; 
the Future being but a fiction of the mind, applying the sequels of 
actions Past, to the actions that are Present; which with most certainty 
is done by him that has most Experience; but not with certainty enough. 
And though it be called Prudence, when the Event answereth our 
Expectation; yet in its own nature, it is but Presumption. For the 
foresight of things to come, which is Providence, belongs onely to him 
by whose will they are to come. From him onely, and supernaturally, 
proceeds Prophecy. The best Prophet naturally is the best guesser; and 
the best guesser, he that is most versed and studied in the matters he 
guesses at: for he hath most Signes to guesse by. 
Signes A Signe, is the Event Antecedent, of the Consequent; and 
contrarily, the Consequent of the Antecedent, when the like 
Consequences have been observed, before: And the oftner they have 
been observed, the lesse uncertain is the Signe. And therefore he that 
has most experience in any kind of businesse, has most Signes, 
whereby to guesse at the Future time, and consequently is the most 
prudent: And so much more prudent than he that is new in that kind of 
business, as not to be equalled by any advantage of naturall and 
extemporary wit: though perhaps many young men think the contrary. 
Neverthelesse it is not Prudence that distinguisheth man from beast. 
There be beasts, that at a year old observe more, and pursue that which 
is for their good, more prudently, than a child can do at ten.
Conjecture Of The Time Past As Prudence is a Praesumtion of the 
Future, contracted from the Experience of time Past; So there is a 
Praesumtion of things Past taken from other things (not future but) past 
also. For he that hath seen by what courses and degrees, a flourishing 
State hath first come into civill warre, and then to ruine; upon the sights 
of the ruines of any other State, will guesse, the like warre, and the like 
courses have been there also. But his conjecture, has the same 
incertainty almost with the conjecture of the Future; both being 
grounded onely upon Experience. 
There is no other act of mans mind, that I can remember, naturally 
planted in him, so, as to need no other thing, to the exercise of it, but to 
be born a man, and live with the use of his five Senses. Those other 
Faculties, of which I shall speak by and by, and which seem proper to 
man onely, are acquired, and encreased by study and industry; and of 
most men learned by instruction, and discipline; and proceed all from 
the invention of Words, and Speech. For besides Sense, and Thoughts, 
and the Trayne of thoughts, the mind of man has no other motion; 
though by the help of Speech, and Method, the same Facultyes may be 
improved to such a height, as to distinguish men from all other living 
Creatures. 
Whatsoever we imagine, is Finite. Therefore there is no Idea, or 
conception of anything we call Infinite. No man can have in his mind 
an Image of infinite magnitude; nor conceive the ends, and bounds of 
the thing named; having no Conception of the thing, but of our own 
inability. And therefore the Name of GOD is used, not to make us 
conceive him; (for he is Incomprehensible; and his greatnesse, and 
power are unconceivable;) but that we may honour him. Also because 
whatsoever (as I said before,) we conceive, has been perceived first by 
sense, either all at once, or by parts; a man can have no thought, 
representing any thing, not subject to sense. No man therefore can 
conceive any thing, but he must conceive it in some place; and indued 
with some determinate magnitude; and which may be divided into parts; 
nor that any thing is all in this place, and all in another place at the 
same time; nor that two,    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.