La moza de cántaro | Page 5

the time mentioned above in the household of the Duke of Alba at Alba de Tormes. It was here that, before select audiences, were first presented his early plays or églogas. The plays of Encina, fourteen in number, were staged and constitute the modest beginnings of a movement that was to develop rapidly in the next two decades. A contemporary of Juan del Encina, Fernando de Rojas, published in 1498 his famous dramatized romance, La Celestina, which, while it was not suited for representation on the stage, was a work of great literary merit and had remarkable influence on the early drama. About the same time a disciple of Juan del Encina, Gil Vicente, founded the Portuguese theater and made notable contributions to Spanish letters, for he seems to have written with equal facility in the two idioms. Perhaps the greatest dramatic genius of the period, Bartolomé Torres Naharro, while he wrote in Spanish, passed the greater part of his life in Italy, where he published at Naples in 1517 an edition of his plays entitled Propaladia. He, first of Spanish authors, divided his plays into five acts, called jornadas, limited the number of personages, and created a plot worthy of the name.
For almost half a century after the publication of the Propaladia the Spanish theater advanced but little, for this was the period when Carlos Quinto ruled Spain and kept the national interest fixed on his military achievements, which were for the most part outside of the peninsula. But about 1560 there flourished in Spain probably the most important figure in the early history of the national drama. This was the Sevillian gold-beater, later actor and dramatic author, Lope de Rueda. The dramatic representations before this time were doubtless limited in a large measure to select audiences in castles and courts of noble residences; but Lope de Rueda had as his theater the public squares and market-places, and as his audience the great masses of the Spanish people, who now for the first time had a chance to dictate the trend which the national drama should take. In his r?le of manager and playwright Lope de Rueda showed no remarkable genius, but he began a movement which was to reach its culmination and perfection under the leadership of no less a personage than the great Lope himself. Between the two Lopes there lived and wrote a number of dramatic authors of diverse merit. Lope de Rueda's work was continued by the Valencian bookseller, Juan de Timoneda, and by his fellow actors, Alonso de la Vega and Alonso de Cisneros. In this interim there took place a struggle between the popular and classic schools. The former was defended by such authors as Juan de la Cueva and Cristóbal de Virués, while the latter was espoused by Gerónimo Bermúdez and others. The immortal Cervantes wrote many plays in this period and claimed to favor the classic drama, but his dramatic works are not of sufficient importance to win for him a place in either party. Thus we find that in 1585 Spain had a divided drama, represented on the one side by the drama of reason and proportion fashioned after Greek and Roman models, and on the other a loosely joined, irregular, romantic drama of adventure and intrigue, such as was demanded by the Spanish temperament. Besides the defenders of these schools there was an infinite variety of lesser lights who wrote all sorts of plays from the grossest farces to the dullest Latin dramas. Before taking up the discussion of the works of the mighty genius who was to establish the popular drama, it is well to give a brief glance at the people who presented plays and the places in which they were given.
As has been already observed, the dramas of Juan del Encina and his immediate successors were probably presented to limited audiences. It is not improbable that parts were often taken by amateurs rather than by members of regular troupes. However, at an early date there were many strolling players who are classed in the Viaje entretenido in no less than eight professional grades: (1) The bululú, a solitary stroller who went from village to village reading simple pieces in public places and living from the scanty collections taken among the audience. (2) The ?aque, two players, who could perform entremeses and play one or two musical instruments. (3) The gangarilla, group of three or four actors of whom one was a boy to play a woman's part. They usually played a farce or some other short play. (4) The cambaleo was composed of five men and a woman and remained several days in each village. (5) The garnacha was a little larger than the cambaleo and could represent four plays and several autos and entremeses. (6)