These 
are the three chief points of interest about Lyly, but they do not exhaust 
the problems he presents. We shall have to notice also that as a 
pamphleteer he becomes entangled in the famous Marprelate 
controversy, and that he was one of the first, being perhaps even earlier 
than Marlowe, to perceive the value of blank verse for dramatic 
purposes. Finally, as we have seen, he was the reputed author of some 
delightful lyrics. 
The man of whom one can say such things, the man who showed such 
versatility and range of expression, the man who took the world by 
storm and made euphuism the fashion at court before he was well out 
of his nonage, who for years provided the great Queen with food for 
laughter, and who was connected with the first ominous outburst of the 
Puritan spirit, surely possesses personal attractions apart from any 
literary considerations. We shall presently see reason to believe that his 
personality was a brilliant and fascinating one. But such a 
reconstruction of the artist[2] is only possible after a thorough analysis 
of his works. It would be as well here, however, by way of obtaining an 
historical framework for our study, to give a brief account of his life as 
it is known to us. 
[2] Cf. Hennequin. 
"Eloquent and witty" John Lyly first saw light in the year 1553 or
1554[3]. Anthony à Wood, the 17th century author of Athenae 
Oxonienses, tells us that he was, like his contemporary Stephen Gosson, 
a Kentish man born[4]; and with this clue to help them both Mr Bond 
and Mr Baker are inclined to accept much of the story of Fidus as 
autobiographical[5]. If their inference be correct, our author would 
seem to have been the son of middle-class, but well-to-do, parents. But 
it is with his residence at Oxford that any authentic account of his life 
must begin, and even then our information is very meagre. Wood tells 
us that he "became a student in Magdalen College in the beginning of 
1569, aged 16 or thereabouts." "And since," adds Mr Bond, "in 1574 he 
describes himself as Burleigh's alumnus, and owns obligations to him, 
it is possible that he owed his university career to Burleigh's 
assistance[6]." And yet, limited as our knowledge is, it is possible, I 
think, to form a fairly accurate conception of Lyly's manner of life at 
Oxford, if we are bold enough to read between the lines of the scraps of 
contemporary evidence that have come down to us. Lyly himself tells 
us that he left Oxford for three years not long after his arrival. 
"Oxford," he says, "seemed to weane me before she brought me forth, 
and to give me boanes to gnawe, before I could get the teate to suck. 
Wherein she played the nice mother in sending me into the countrie to 
nurse, where I tyred at a drie breast for three years and was at last 
inforced to weane myself." Mr Bond, influenced by the high moral tone 
of Euphues, which, as we shall see, was merely a traditional literary 
prose borrowed from the moral court treatise, is anxious to vindicate 
Lyly from all charges of lawlessness, and refuses to admit that the 
foregoing words refer to rustication[7]. Lyly's enforced absence he 
holds was due to the plague which broke out at Oxford at this time. 
Such an interpretation seems to me to be sufficiently disposed of by the 
fact that the plague in question did not break out until 1571[8], while 
Lyly's words must refer to a departure (at the very latest) in 1570. 
Everything, in fact, goes to show that he was out of favour with the 
University authorities. In the first place he seems to have paid small 
attention to his regular studies. To quote Wood again, he was "always 
averse to the crabbed studies of Logic and Philosophy. For so it was 
that his genie, being naturally bent to the pleasant paths of poetry (as if 
Apollo had given to him a wreath of his own Bays without snatching or 
struggling), did in a manner neglect academical studies, yet not so
much but that he took the Degree in Arts, that of Master being 
completed in 1575[9]." 
[3] Bond, I. p. 2; Baker, p. v. 
[4] Ath. Ox. (ed. Bliss), I. p. 676. 
[5] Euphues, p. 268. 
[6] Bond, I. p. 6. But Baker, pp. vii, viii, would seem to disagree with 
this. 
[7] Bond, I. p. 11. 
[8] Baker, p. xii. 
[9] Athenae Oxonienses (ed. Bliss), I. p. 676. 
Neglect of the recognised studies, however, was not the only blot upon 
Lyly's Oxford life. From the hints thrown out by his contemporaries, 
and from some allusions, doubtless personal, in the Euphues, we learn 
that, as an undergraduate, he was an irresponsible    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.