Home Rule | Page 2

seemed ready to admit the need for some solution: to-day they have apparently drifted back to the barren position of opposing all proposals for Home Rule: if they were to render this solution impossible, they would but make the problem more urgent.
EDWARD GREY.
February, 1912.

CONTENTS
CHAPTER I.
THE HOME RULE CASE 3 The Case that Does Not Change: (i.) The Sea. (ii.) The Race. (iii.) The Creed.
CHAPTER II.
THE HOME RULE CASE 19 The Case that Has Changed and is Now Stronger: (i.) The Councils and (ii.) The Land.
CHAPTER III.
THE HOME RULE CASE 35 The Case that Has Changed--(continued): (i.) The Congested Districts. (ii.) The Board of Agriculture. (iii.) Old-Age Pensions. (iv.) The Universities.
CHAPTER IV.
THE HOME RULE PLAN 47 The Nineteenth Century Bills and the Bill of 1912.
CHAPTER V.
HOME RULE DIFFICULTIES 63 Ulster.
CHAPTER VI.
HOME RULE DIFFICULTIES 77 Rome Rule or Home Rule?
CHAPTER VII.
HOME RULE IN HISTORY 89 Five Centuries of Limited Home Rule (1265-1780).
CHAPTER VIII.
HOME RULE IN HISTORY 99 Grattan's Parliament.
CHAPTER IX.
HOME RULE IN THE WORLD 113 The Case from Analogy.
CHAPTER X.
HOME RULE FINANCE 125
APPENDICES.
A. The Home Rule Bill of 1912 143 B. The Shrinkage of Ireland 160 C. The Act of Union 163 D. The Home Rule Bills of 1886 and 1893 167 E. The Irish Board of Agriculture 184 F. The Reduction in Irish Pauperism 186 G. The Land Law (Ireland) Act, 1881 187 H. The Congested Districts Board 188 J. Irish Canals and Railways 190 K. Home Rule Parliaments in the British Empire 191

THE HOME RULE CASE
THE CASE THAT DOES NOT CHANGE
i.--THE SEA. ii.--THE RACE. iii.--THE CREED.
"Ireland hears the ocean protesting against Separation, but she hears the sea likewise protesting against Union. She follows her physical destination and obeys the dispensations of Providence."
GRATTAN (First speech against the Union 15th January, 1800).
CHAPTER I.
THE HOME RULE CASE
Very nearly a generation of time has elapsed since, in 1886, Mr. Gladstone expounded in the British House of Commons his first Bill for restoring to Ireland a Home Rule Parliament. Nearly twenty years have passed since that same great man, indomitably defying age and infirmities in the pursuit of his great ideal, passed the second Home Rule Bill (1893) through the British House of Commons. That Bill stands to-day unshaken in regard to all its vital clauses. Some of us still hold the faith that that Bill would, if it had become law in 1893, have saved Ireland from many years of wastage, and would have built up, to face our enemies in the gate, a stronger and stouter fabric of Empire.
The Bill of 1893 only survived the perilous tempests of the House of Commons[1] to fall a victim to the House of Lords.[2]
Nearly twenty years have elapsed since that day, and now the successors of Mr. Gladstone, the Progressives of the United Kingdom, Liberals, Labour Members and Nationalists, approach the same task with the Bill of 1912.[3] Some of them are veterans of the former strife. They can turn, like the present writer, to the thumbed diaries of that great combat,[4] and can recall the great scenes of that prolonged Parliamentary agony with a sense of treading again some well-worn road. Others are new to the issue, and can only hear, like "horns of Elf-land faintly blowing," some faint echo from the dawn of consciousness.
But young or old, we must again set forth on our travels, and this time--
"It may be that we shall touch the Happy Isles."
It will be the memory of the "Great Achilles" that will sustain us. For this task comes to Liberals as a sacred trust from Mr. Gladstone. It is from him that they have learnt that race-hatred is poison, and that the only true union between nations is--in a phrase that has outlived the silly laughter of the shallow--the "Union of Hearts."[5] It is Mr. Gladstone's work that they design to accomplish. It is the memory of his passionate and sustained devotion through the last twenty years of that glorious life that has thrown a halo round this cause, and still gilds it with a "heavenly alchemy."
But, before we "smite the sounding furrows," our first duty is to survey once more the seas over which we shall have to voyage. We have to consider again both the old and the new "case for Home Rule"--not merely the case of 1886 or 1893, but the still stronger case of 1912.
For the world never stands still, and in every generation every great human problem presents different aspects, and shows new lights and shadows. Every great human question is like a great mountain which on a second or third visit reveals new and unsuspected depths and heights, new valleys and new peaks, slopes which new avalanches have furrowed, and glaciers which have receded or advanced.
Not that the real, great, main outline ever changes. As with the mountains, so with the great human