Handbook of Home Rule

Home Rule (1887), by W. E.
Gladstone et al.

Project Gutenberg's Handbook of Home Rule (1887), by W. E.
Gladstone et al. This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no
cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give
it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License
included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.net
Title: Handbook of Home Rule (1887)
Author: W. E. Gladstone et al.
Release Date: December 29, 2004 [EBook #14518]
Language: English
Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK
HANDBOOK OF HOME RULE (1887) ***

Produced by Jonathan Ingram, Aaron Reed and the PG Online
Distributed Proofreading Team

HANDBOOK OF HOME RULE
BEING ARTICLES ON THE IRISH QUESTION

BY THE RIGHT HON. W.E. GLADSTONE, M.P. THE RIGHT HON.
JOHN MORLEY, M.P., LORD THRING JAMES BRYCE, M.P.,
CANON MACCOLL E.L. GODKIN, AND R. BARRY O'BRIEN
WITH PREFACE BY THE RIGHT HON. EARL SPENCER, K.G.
EDITED BY JAMES BRYCE, M.P.
SECOND EDITION
LONDON KEGAN PAUL, TRENCH & CO., I, PATERNOSTER
SQUARE 1887

EDITOR'S NOTE.
Of the articles contained in this volume, those by Mr. Gladstone, Mr.
E.L. Godkin on "A Lawyer's Objections to Home Rule," and Mr. Barry
O'Brien appear for the first time. The others are reprinted from the
Contemporary Review, the Nineteenth Century, and the New Princeton
Review, to the proprietors and editors of which periodicals respectively
the thanks of the several writers and of the editor are tendered. In most
of these reprints some passages of transitory interest have been omitted,
and some few additions have been made.
The object of the writers has been to treat the difficult questions
connected with the Government of Ireland in a dispassionate spirit; and
the volume is offered to the public in the hope that it may, at a time of
warm controversy over passing events, help to lead thoughtful men
back to the consideration of the principles which underlie those
questions, and which it seeks to elucidate by calm discussion and by
references to history.
October, 1887.

CONTENTS.

PREFACE. BY THE RIGHT HON. EARL SPENCER, K.G.
AMERICAN HOME RULE. BY E.L. GODKIN
HOW WE BECAME HOME RULERS. BY JAMES BRYCE, M.P.
HOME RULE AND IMPERIAL UNITY. BY LORD THRING
THE IRISH GOVERNMENT BILL AND THE IRISH LAND BILL.
BY LORD THRING
THE "UNIONIST" POSITION. BY CANON MACCOLL
A LAWYER'S OBJECTIONS TO HOME RULE. BY E.L. GODKIN
THE "UNIONIST" CASE FOR HOME RULE. BY R. BARRY
O'BRIEN
IRELAND'S ALTERNATIVES. BY LORD THRING
THE PAST AND FUTURE OF THE IRISH QUESTION. BY JAMES
BRYCE, M.P.
SOME ARGUMENTS CONSIDERED. BY THE RIGHT HON. JOHN
MORLEY, M.P.
LESSONS OF IRISH HISTORY IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY.
BY THE RIGHT HON. W.E. GLADSTONE, M.P.

PREFACE.
The present seems an excellent moment for bringing forward the
arguments in favour of a new policy for Ireland, which are to be found
in the articles contained in this volume.
We are realizing the first results of the verdict given at the election of
1886. And this I interpret as saying that the constituencies were not
then ready to depart from the lines of policy which, up to last year,

nearly all politicians of both parties in Parliament had laid down for
their guidance in Irish affairs.
We have had the Session occupied almost wholly with Lord Salisbury's
proposals for strengthening the power of the central Government to
maintain law and order in Ireland, and for dealing with the most
pressing necessities of the Land question in that country.
It is well, before the policy of the Government is practically tested, that
the views of thoughtful men holding different opinions should be
clearly set forth, not in the shape of polemical speeches, but in
measured articles which specially appeal to those who have not hitherto
joined the fighting ranks of either side, and who are sure to intervene
with great force at the next election, when the Irish question is again
submitted to the constituencies.
I feel that I can add little or nothing to the weight of the arguments
contained in these papers, but I should like to give some reasons why I
earnestly hope that they will receive careful consideration.
The writers have endeavoured to approach their work with impartiality,
and to free themselves from those prejudices which make it difficult for
Englishmen to discuss Irish questions in a fresh and independent train
of thought, and realize how widely Irish customs, laws, traditions, and
sentiments differ from our own.
We are apt to think that what has worked well here will work well in
Ireland; that Irishmen who differ from us are unreasonable; and that
their proposals for change must be mistaken. We do not make
allowance for the soreness of feeling prevailing among men who have