field of his medical activities are 
equally unknown. Bale, Pits and Leland, the earliest English 
biographers, tell us that Gilbert, after the completion of his studies in 
England, proceeded to the Continent to enlarge his education, and 
finally became physician to the great Justiciar, Hubert Walter, 
archbishop of Canterbury, who died in the year 1205. This would place 
him under the reign of King John, in the early part of the thirteenth 
century. 
Dr. John Freind, however, the famous English physician and medical
historian (1725), observing that Gilbert quotes the Arabian philosopher 
Averroës (who died in 1198), and believing that he also quotes a work 
of Roger Bacon and the surgical writings of Theodorius (Borgognoni) 
of Cervia (1266), was inclined to fix his period in the latter half of the 
thirteenth century, probably under the reign of Edward I. Most of the 
later historians of medicine have followed the views of Freind. Thus 
Eloy adopts the date 1272, Sprengel gives 1290, Haeser the same date, 
Hirsch says Gilbert lived towards the close of the thirteenth century, 
Baas adopts the figures 1290, etc. 
The most recent biographers of Gilbert, however, Mr. C.L. 
Kingsford[1], and the late Dr. Joseph Frank Payne[2], after an 
apparently careful and independent investigation of his life, have 
reached conclusions which vary materially from each other and from 
those of the historians mentioned. Mr. Kingsford fixes the date of 
Gilbert at about 1250, while Dr. Payne reverts to the views of Bale and 
Pits and suggests as approximate figures for the birth and death of 
Gilbert the years 1170-80 to 1230. This discrepancy of twenty-five or 
thirty years between the views of two competent and unprejudiced 
investigators, as a mere question of erudition and interpretation, is 
perhaps scarcely worthy of prolonged discussion. But as both 
biographers argue from substantially the same data, the arguments 
reveal so many interesting and pertinent facts, and the numerous 
difficulties attending the interpretation of these facts, that some 
comparison of the different views of the biographers and some 
criticism of their varying conclusions may not be unwelcome. 
[Footnote 1: In Leslie Stephen's "Dictionary of Biography."] 
[Footnote 2: British Medical Journal, Nov. 12, 1904, p. 1282.] 
In the first place then we must say that, as Gilbert is frequently quoted 
in the "Thesaurus Pauperum," a work ascribed to Petrus Hispanus, who 
(under the title Pope John XXI) died in 1277, this date determines 
definitely the latest period to which the Compendium can be referred. 
If, as held by some historians, the "Thesaurus" is the work of Julian, the 
father of Petrus, the Compendium can be referred to an earlier date 
only.
Now Gilbert in his Compendium (f. 259a) refers to the writings of 
Averroës (Ibn Roschd) regarding the color of the iris of the eye. 
Averroës died in the year 1198. There is no pretense that Gilbert was 
familiar with the Arabic tongue, and the earliest translations into Latin 
of the writings of Averroës are ascribed by Bacon to the famous 
Michael Scot, though Bacon says they were chiefly the work of a 
certain Jew named Andrew, who made the translations for Scot. Bacon 
also says that these translations were made "nostris temporibus," in our 
time, a loose expression, which may, perhaps, be fairly interpreted to 
include the period 1230-1250. But if, as Dr. Payne believes, Gilbert 
died about 1230, it seems improbable that he could have been familiar 
with the translations of Michael Scot. Accordingly Dr. Payne suggests 
that, after the death of his patron in 1205, Gilbert returned to the 
Continent, and, perhaps in Paris or at Montpellier, met with earlier 
Latin versions of the writings of the Arabian physician and philosopher. 
This is, of course, possible, but there is no historical warrant for the 
hypothesis, which must, for the present at least, be regarded as merely a 
happy conjecture of Dr. Payne. The presence of Gilbert upon the 
Continent, probably as a teacher of reputation, seems, however, quite 
probable. Littre has even unearthed the fact that during the 14th century 
a street in Paris near the medical schools, bore the name of the Rue 
Gilbert l'Anglois. A MS. in the Bibliotheque Nationale entitled 
"_Experimenta Magistri Gilliberti, Cancellarii Montepessulani_" has 
suggested also the idea that Gilbert may have been at one time 
chancellor of the University of Montpellier. Dr. P. Pansier, of Avignon, 
however, who has carefully examined and published this manuscript[3], 
reports that while it contains some formulae found also in the 
Compendium of Gilbert, it contains many others from apparently other 
sources, and he was unable to convince himself that the compilation 
was in fact the work of Gilbertus Anglicus. Dr. Pansier also furnishes 
us with a list of the chancellors of Montpellier, which contains the 
name of a certain "Gillibertus," chancellor of the university in 1250. He 
could find, however, no    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.