to 
all her commands. And the first step to be taken, or, rather, perhaps the 
first essential condition required for the performance of this duty, is the 
fixing of the conviction in her own mind that it is a duty. 
Unfortunately, however, there are not only vast numbers of mothers 
who do not in any degree perform this duty, but a large proportion of 
them have not even a theoretical idea of the obligation of it. 
An Objection. 
"I wish my child to be governed by reason and reflection," says one. "I 
wish him to see the necessity and propriety of what I require of him, so 
that he may render a ready and willing compliance with my wishes, 
instead of being obliged blindly to submit to arbitrary and despotic 
power." 
She forgets that the faculties of reason and reflection, and the power of 
appreciating "the necessity and propriety of things," and of bringing 
considerations of future, remote, and perhaps contingent good and evil 
to restrain and subdue the impetuousness of appetites and passions 
eager for present pleasure, are qualities that appear late, and are very 
slowly developed, in the infantile mind; that no real reliance whatever 
can be placed upon them in the early years of life; and that, moreover, 
one of the chief and expressly intended objects of the establishment of 
the parental relation is to provide, in the mature reason and reflection of 
the father and mother, the means of guidance which the embryo reason 
and reflection of the child could not afford during the period of his 
immaturity.
The two great Elements of Parental Obligation. 
Indeed, the chief end and aim of the parental relation, as designed by 
the Author of nature, may be considered as comprised, it would seem, 
in these two objects, namely: first, the support of the child by the 
strength of his parents during the period necessary for the development 
of his strength, and, secondly, his guidance and direction by their 
reason during the development of his reason. The second of these 
obligations is no less imperious than the first. To expect him to provide 
the means of his support from the resources of his own embryo strength, 
would imply no greater misapprehension on the part of his father and 
mother than to look for the exercise of any really controlling influence 
over his conduct by his embryo reason. The expectation in the two 
cases would be equally vain. The only difference would be that, in the 
failure which would inevitably result from the trial, it would be in the 
one case the body that would suffer, and in the other the soul. 
The Judgment more slowly developed than the Strength. 
Indeed, the necessity that the conduct of the child should be controlled 
by the reason of the parents is in one point of view greater, or at least 
more protracted, than that his wants should be supplied by their power; 
for the development of the thinking and reasoning powers is late and 
slow in comparison with the advancement toward maturity of the 
physical powers. It is considered that a boy attains, in this country, to a 
sufficient degree of strength at the age of from seven to ten years to 
earn his living; but his reason is not sufficiently mature to make it safe 
to intrust him with the care of himself and of his affairs, in the 
judgment of the law, till he is of more than twice that age. The parents 
can actually thus sooner look to the strength of the child for his support 
than they can to his reason for his guidance. 
What Parents have to do in Respect to the Reasoning Powers of 
Children. 
To aid in the development and cultivation of the thinking and reasoning 
powers is doubtless a very important part of a parent's duty. But to 
cultivate these faculties is one thing, while to make any control which
may be procured for them over the mind of the child the basis of 
government, is another. To explain the reasons of our commands is 
excellent, if it is done in the right time and manner. The wrong time is 
when the question of obedience is pending, and the wrong manner is 
when they are offered as inducements to obey. We may offer reasons 
for recommendations, when we leave the child to judge of their force, 
and to act according to our recommendations or not, as his judgment 
shall dictate. But reasons should never be given as inducements to obey 
a command. The more completely the obedience to a command rests on 
the principle of simple submission to authority, the easier and better it 
will be both for parent and child. 
Manner of exercising Authority. 
Let no reader fall into the error of supposing that the mother's    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.