Essays on Art | Page 7

what talent can avail to penetrate a
nature such as thine? What tongue will it be that can unfold so great a
wonder? Verily none. This it is that guides the human discourse to the
considering of divine things.[1]
[Footnote 1: The sayings of Leonardo quoted in this article are taken
from _Leonardo da Vinci's Notebooks_, by E. M'Curdy. (Duckworth,
1906.)]
To Leonardo causation meant the escape from caprice; it meant a
secure relation between man and all things, in which man would gain
power by knowledge, in which every increase of knowledge would
reveal to him more and more of the supreme reason. There was no
chain for him in cause and effect, no unthinking of the will of man.
Rather by knowledge man would discover his own will and know that
it was the universal will. So man must never be afraid of knowledge.
"The eye is the window of the soul." Like Whitman he tells us always
to look with the eye, and so to confound the wisdom of ages. There is
in every man's vision the power of relating himself now and directly to
reality by knowledge; and in knowing other things he knows himself.
By knowledge man changes what seemed to be a compulsion into a
harmony; he gives up his own caprice for the universal will.
That is the religion of Leonardo, in art as in science. For him the artist
also must relate himself directly to the visible world, in which is the
only inspiration; to accept any formula is to see with dead men's eyes.
That has been said again and again by artists, but not with Leonardo's
mystical and philosophical conviction. He knew that it is vain to study
Nature unless she is to you a goddess or a god; you can learn nothing

from reality unless you adore it, and in adoring it he found his freedom.
How different is this doctrine from that with which, after centuries of
scientific advance, we intimidate ourselves. We are threatened by a
creed far more enslaving than that of the Middle Ages. If the Middle
Ages turned to the past to learn what they were to think or to do, we
turn to the past to learn what we are. They may have feared the new;
but we say that there is no new, nothing but some combination or
variation of the old. Causation is to us a chain that binds us to the past,
but to Leonardo it was freedom; and so he prophesies a freedom that
we may attain to not by denying facts or making myths, but by
discovering what he hinted--that causation itself is not compulsion but
will, and our will if, by knowledge, we make it ours.
No one before him had been so much in love with reality, whatever it
may be. He was called a sceptic, but it was only that he preferred
reality itself to any tales about it; and his religion, his worship, was the
search for the very fact. This, because he was both artist and man of
science, he carried further than anyone else, pursuing it with all his
faculties. In his drawings there is the beauty not of his character, but of
the character of what he draws; he does not make a design, but finds it.
That beauty proves him a Florentine--Dürer himself falls short of
it--but it is the beauty of the thing itself, discovered and insisted upon
with the passion of a lover. He draws animals, trees, flowers, as
Correggio draws Antiope or Io; and it is only in his drawings now that
he speaks clearly to us. The "Mona Lisa" is well enough, but another
hand might have executed the painting of it. It owes its popular fame to
the smile about which it is so easy to write finely; but in the drawings
we see the experiencing passion of Leonardo himself, we see him
feeling, as in the notebooks we see him thinking. There is the eagerness
of discovery at which so often he stopped short, turning away from a
task to further discovery, living always in the moment, taking no
thought either for the morrow or for yesterday, unable to attend to any
business, even the business of the artist, seeing life not as a struggle or
a duty, but as an adventure of all the senses and all the faculties. He is,
even with his pencil, the greatest talker in the world, but without
egotism, talking always of what he sees, satisfying himself not with the
common appetites and passions of men, but with his one supreme
passion for reality. If Michelangelo thought him a dilettante, there must

have been in his taunt some envy of Leonardo's freedom.
Yet once at least Leonardo did achieve, and