for the
spice of temper which renders it untrustworthy,' is light enough. On
Politics she is rhetorical and swings: she wrote to spur a junior
politician: 'It is the first business of men, the school to mediocrity, to
the covetously ambitious a sty, to the dullard his amphitheatre, arms of
Titans to the desperately enterprising, Olympus to the genius.' What a
woman thinks of women, is the test of her nature. She saw their
existing posture clearly, yet believed, as men disincline to do, that they
grow. She says, that 'In their judgements upon women men are females,
voices of the present (sexual) dilemma.' They desire to have 'a still
woman; who can make a constant society of her pins and needles.'
They create by stoppage a volcano, and are amazed at its eruptiveness.
'We live alone, and do not much feel it till we are visited.' Love is
presumably the visitor. Of the greater loneliness of women, she says: 'It
is due to the prescribed circumscription of their minds, of which they
become aware in agitation. Were the walls about them beaten down,
they would understand that solitariness is a common human fate and
the one chance of growth, like space for timber.' As to the sensations of
women after the beating down of the walls, she owns that the multitude
of the timorous would yearn in shivering affright for the old prison-nest,
according to the sage prognostic of men; but the flying of a valiant few
would form a vanguard. And we are informed that the beginning of a
motive life with women must be in the head, equally with men (by no
means a truism when she wrote). Also that 'men do not so much fear to
lose the hearts of thoughtful women as their strict attention to their
graces.' The present market is what men are for preserving: an
observation of still reverberating force. Generally in her character of
the feminine combatant there is a turn of phrase, like a dimple near the
lips showing her knowledge that she was uttering but a tart measure of
the truth. She had always too much lambent humour to be the dupe of
the passion wherewith, as she says, 'we lash ourselves into the
persuasive speech distinguishing us from the animals.'
The instances of her drollery are rather hinted by the Diarists for the
benefit of those who had met her and could inhale the atmosphere at a
word. Drolleries, humours, reputed witticisms, are like odours of roast
meats, past with the picking of the joint. Idea is the only vital breath.
They have it rarely, or it eludes the chronicler. To say of the great
erratic and forsaken Lady A****, after she had accepted the
consolations of Bacchus, that her name was properly signified in
asterisks 'as she was now nightly an Ariadne in heaven through her
God,' sounds to us a roundabout, with wit somewhere and fun nowhere.
Sitting at the roast we might have thought differently. Perry Wilkinson
is not happier in citing her reply to his compliment on the reviewers'
unanimous eulogy of her humour and pathos:--the 'merry clown and
poor pantaloon demanded of us in every work of fiction,' she says,
lamenting the writer's compulsion to go on producing them for
applause until it is extremest age that knocks their knees. We are
informed by Lady Pennon of 'the most amusing description of the first
impressions of a pretty English simpleton in Paris'; and here is an
opportunity for ludicrous contrast of the French and English styles of
pushing flatteries--'piping to the charmed animal,' as Mrs. Warwick
terms it in another place: but Lady Pennon was acquainted with the
silly woman of the piece, and found her amusement in the 'wonderful
truth' of that representation.
Diarists of amusing passages are under an obligation to paint us a
realistic revival of the time, or we miss the relish. The odour of the
roast, and more, a slice of it is required, unless the humorous thing be
preternaturally spirited to walk the earth as one immortal among a
number less numerous than the mythic Gods. 'He gives good dinners,' a
candid old critic said, when asked how it was that he could praise a
certain poet. In an island of chills and fogs, coelum crebris imbribus ac
nebulis foedum, the comic and other perceptions are dependent on the
stirring of the gastric juices. And such a revival by any of us would be
impolitic, were it a possible attempt, before our systems shall have
been fortified by philosophy. Then may it be allowed to the Diarist
simply to relate, and we can copy from him.
Then, ah! then, moreover, will the novelist's Art, now neither blushless
infant nor executive man, have attained its majority. We can then be
Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.