Biographical Essays | Page 9

therefore of all the ministers in its

equipage. Puritanism frowned upon these pursuits, as ruinous to public
morals; on the other hand, loyalty could not but tolerate what was
patronized by the sovereign; and it happened that Elizabeth, James, and
Charles I., were all alike lovers and promoters of theatrical amusements,
which were indeed more indispensable to the relief of court ceremony,
and the monotony of aulic pomp, than in any other region of life. This
royal support, and the consciousness that any brilliant success in these
arts implied an unusual share of natural endowments, did something in
mitigation of a scorn which must else have been intolerable to all
generous natures.
But whatever prejudice might thus operate against the perfect sanctity
of Shakspeare's posthumous reputation, it is certain that the splendor of
his worldly success must have done much to obliterate that effect; his
admirable colloquial talents a good deal, and his gracious affability still
more. The wonder, therefore, will still remain, that Betterton, in less
than a century from his death, should have been able to glean so little.
And for the solution of this wonder, we must throw ourselves chiefly
upon the explanations we have made as to the parliamentary war, and
the local ravages of its progress in the very district, of the very town,
and the very house.
If further arguments are still wanted to explain this mysterious abolition,
we may refer the reader to the following succession of disastrous events,
by which it should seem that a perfect malice of misfortune pursued the
vestiges of the mighty poet's steps. In 1613, the Globe theatre, with
which he had been so long connected, was burned to the ground. Soon
afterwards a great fire occurred in Stratford; and next, (without
counting upon the fire of London, just fifty years after his death, which,
however, would consume many an important record from periods far
more remote,) the house of Ben Jonson, in which probably, as Mr.
Campbell suggests, might be parts of his correspondence, was also
burned. Finally, there was an old tradition that Lady Barnard, the sole
grand-daughter of Shakspeare, had carried off many of his papers from
Stratford, and these papers have never since been traced.
In many of the elder lives it has been asserted, that John Shakspeare,

the father of the poet, was a butcher, and in others that he was a
woolstapler. It is now settled beyond dispute that he was a glover. This
was his professed occupation in Stratford, though it is certain that, with
this leading trade, from which he took his denomination, he combined
some collateral pursuits; and it is possible enough that, as openings
offered, he may have meddled with many. In that age, and in a
provincial town, nothing like the exquisite subdivision of labor was
attempted which we now see realized in the great cities of Christendom.
And one trade is often found to play into another with so much
reciprocal advantage, that even in our own days we do not much
wonder at an enterprising man, in country places, who combines
several in his own person. Accordingly, John Shakspeare is known to
have united with his town calling the rural and miscellaneous
occupations of a farmer.
Meantime his avowed business stood upon a very different footing
from the same trade as it is exercised in modern times. Gloves were in
that age an article of dress more costly by much, and more elaborately
decorated, than in our own. They were a customary present from some
cities to the judges of assize, and to other official persons; a custom of
ancient standing, and in some places, we believe, still subsisting; and in
such cases it is reasonable to suppose, that the gloves must originally
have been more valuable than the trivial modern article of the same
name. So also, perhaps, in their origin, of the gloves given at funerals.
In reality, whenever the simplicity of an age makes it difficult to renew
the parts of a wardrobe, except in capital towns of difficult access,
prudence suggests that such wares should be manufactured of more
durable materials; and, being so, they become obviously susceptible of
more lavish ornament. But it will not follow, from this essential
difference in the gloves of Shakspeare's age, that the glover's
occupation was more lucrative. Doubtless he sold more costly gloves,
and upon each pair had a larger profit, but for that very reason he sold
fewer. Two or three gentlemen "of worship" in the neighborhood might
occasionally require a pair of gloves, but it is very doubtful whether
any inhabitant of Stratford would ever call for so mere a luxury.
The practical result, at all events, of John Shakspeare's various pursuits,

does not appear permanently to have met the demands of his
establishment, and