growth of this coarser traffic that has made "Town" at last so utterly detestable.
But if one reflects, it becomes clear that, save for the vans of goods, this moving tide of
wheeled masses is still essentially a stream of urban pedestrians, pedestrians who, by
reason of the distances they have to go, have had to jump on 'buses and take cabs--in a
word, to bring in the high road to their aid. And the vehicular traffic of the street is
essentially the high road traffic very roughly adapted to the new needs. The cab is a
simple development of the carriage, the omnibus of the coach, and the supplementary
traffic of the underground and electric railways is a by no means brilliantly imagined
adaptation of the long-route railway. These are all still new things, experimental to the
highest degree, changing and bound to change much more, in the period of specialization
that is now beginning.
Now, the first most probable development is a change in the omnibus and the omnibus
railway. A point quite as important with these means of transit as actual speed of
movement is frequency: time is wasted abundantly and most vexatiously at present in
waiting and in accommodating one's arrangements to infrequent times of call and
departure. The more frequent a local service, the more it comes to be relied upon.
Another point--and one in which the omnibus has a great advantage over the railway--is
that it should be possible to get on and off at any point, or at as many points on the route
as possible. But this means a high proportion of stoppages, and this is destructive to
speed. There is, however, one conceivable means of transit that is not simply frequent but
continuous, that may be joined or left at any point without a stoppage, that could be
adapted to many existing streets at the level or quite easily sunken in tunnels, or elevated
above the street level,[11] and that means of transit is the moving platform, whose
possibilities have been exhibited to all the world in a sort of mean caricature at the Paris
Exhibition. Let us imagine the inner circle of the district railway adapted to this
conception. I will presume that the Parisian "rolling platform" is familiar to the reader.
The district railway tunnel is, I imagine, about twenty-four feet wide. If we suppose the
space given to six platforms of three feet wide and one (the most rapid) of six feet, and if
we suppose each platform to be going four miles an hour faster than its slower fellow (a
velocity the Paris experiment has shown to be perfectly comfortable and safe), we should
have the upper platform running round the circle at a pace of twenty-eight miles an hour.
If, further, we adopt an ingenious suggestion of Professor Perry's, and imagine the
descent to the line made down a very slowly rotating staircase at the centre of a big
rotating wheel-shaped platform, against a portion of whose rim the slowest platform runs
in a curve, one could very easily add a speed of six or eight miles an hour more, and to
that the man in a hurry would be able to add his own four miles an hour by walking in the
direction of motion. If the reader is a traveller, and if he will imagine that black and
sulphurous tunnel, swept and garnished, lit and sweet, with a train much faster than the
existing underground trains perpetually ready to go off with him and never crowded--if
he will further imagine this train a platform set with comfortable seats and neat bookstalls
and so forth, he will get an inkling in just one detail of what he perhaps misses by living
now instead of thirty or forty years ahead.
I have supposed the replacement to occur in the case of the London Inner Circle Railway,
because there the necessary tunnel already exists to help the imagination of the English
reader, but that the specific replacement will occur is rendered improbable by the fact that
the circle is for much of its circumference entangled with other lines of
communication--the North-Western Railway, for example. As a matter of fact, as the
American reader at least will promptly see, the much more practicable thing is that upper
footpath, with these moving platforms beside it, running out over the street after the
manner of the viaduct of an elevated railroad. But in some cases, at any rate, the
demonstrated cheapness and practicability of tunnels at a considerable depth will come
into play.
Will this diversion of the vast omnibus traffic of to-day into the air and underground,
together with the segregation of van traffic to specific routes and times, be the only
change in the streets of the new century?
Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.