쩘American Addresses, with a Lecture on the Study of Biology
The Project Gutenberg eBook, American Addresses, with a Lecture on the
Study of Biology, by Tomas Henry Huxley
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.net
Title: American Addresses, with a Lecture on the Study of Biology
Author: Tomas Henry Huxley
Release Date: June 26, 2005 [eBook #16136]
Language: English
Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK AMERICAN ADDRESSES, WITH A LECTURE ON THE STUDY OF BIOLOGY***
E-text prepared by Clare Boothby, Jeremy Weatherford, and the Project Gutenberg Online Distributed Proofreading Team (http://www.pgdp.net)
Note: Project Gutenberg also has an HTML version of this file which includes the original illustrations. See 16136-h.htm or 16136-h.zip: (http://www.gutenberg.net/dirs/1/6/1/3/16136/16136-h/16136-h.htm) or (http://www.gutenberg.net/dirs/1/6/1/3/16136/16136-h.zip)
AMERICAN ADDRESSES, WITH A LECTURE ON THE STUDY OF BIOLOGY
by
THOMAS H. HUXLEY.
London: MacMillan and Co. London: R. Clay, Sons, and Taylor, Printers, Bread Street Hill, Queen Victoria Street.
1877
"Natur? leges et regul?, secundum quas omnia fiunt et ex unis formis in alias mutantur, sunt ubique et semper eadem."
B. DE SPINOZA, Ethices, Pars tertia, Pr?fatio.
CONTENTS.
I. THREE LECTURES ON EVOLUTION (New York, September 18, 20, 22, 1876).
LECTURE I. THE THREE HYPOTHESES RESPECTING THE HISTORY OF NATURE
LECTURE II. THE HYPOTHESIS OF EVOLUTION. THE NEUTRAL AND THE FAVOURABLE EVIDENCE
LECTURE III. THE DEMONSTRATIVE EVIDENCE OF EVOLUTION
II. AN ADDRESS ON THE OCCASION OF THE OPENING OF THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY (Baltimore, September 12, 1876)
III. A LECTURE ON THE STUDY OF BIOLOGY, IN CONNECTION WITH THE LOAN COLLECTION OF SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS (South Kensington Museum, December 16, 1876)
NEW YORK.
LECTURES ON EVOLUTION.
LECTURE I.
THE THREE HYPOTHESES RESPECTING THE HISTORY OF NATURE.
We live in and form part of a system of things of immense diversity and perplexity, which we call Nature; and it is a matter of the deepest interest to all of us that we should form just conceptions of the constitution of that system and of its past history. With relation to this universe, man is, in extent, little more than a mathematical point; in duration but a fleeting shadow; he is a mere reed shaken in the winds of force. But, as Pascal long ago remarked, although a mere reed, he is a thinking reed; and in virtue of that wonderful capacity of thought, he has the power of framing for himself a symbolic conception of the universe, which, although doubtless highly imperfect and inadequate as a picture of the great whole, is yet sufficient to serve him as a chart for the guidance of his practical affairs. It has taken long ages of toilsome and often fruitless labour to enable man to look steadily at the shifting scenes of the phantasmagoria of Nature, to notice what is fixed among her fluctuations, and what is regular among her apparent irregularities; and it is only comparatively lately, within the last few centuries, that the conception of a universal order and of a definite course of things, which we term the course of Nature, has emerged.
But, once originated, the conception of the constancy of the order of Nature has become the dominant idea of modern thought. To any person who is familiar with the facts upon which that conception is based, and is competent to estimate their significance, it has ceased to be conceivable that chance should have any place in the universe, or that events should depend upon any but the natural sequence of cause and effect. We have come to look upon the present as the child of the past and as the parent of the future; and, as we have excluded chance from a place in the universe, so we ignore, even as a possibility, the notion of any interference with the order of Nature. Whatever may be men's speculative doctrines, it is quite certain, that every intelligent person guides his life and risks his fortune upon the belief that the order of Nature is constant, and that the chain of natural causation is never broken.
In fact, no belief which we entertain has so complete a logical basis as that to which I have just referred. It tacitly underlies every process of reasoning; it is the foundation of every act of the will. It is based upon the broadest induction, and it is verified by the most constant, regular, and universal of deductive processes. But we must recollect that any human belief, however broad its basis, however defensible it may seem, is, after all, only a probable belief, and that our widest and safest generalizations are simply statements of the highest degree of probability. Though we are quite clear about the constancy of the order of Nature, at the present time, and in the present state of things, it by no means necessarily follows that
Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.