A Voyage to the Moon | Page 2

visited principally by
a few men of science, who wished to learn what I could add to their knowledge of nature.
To this class I was more communicative; and when I severally informed them that I had
actually been to the Moon, some of them shrugged their shoulders, others laughed in my
face, and some were angry at my supposed attempt to deceive them; but all, with a single
exception, were incredulous.
It was to no purpose that I appealed to my former character for veracity. I was answered,
that travelling had changed my morals, as it had changed other people's. I asked what
motives I could have for attempting to deceive them. They replied, the love of
distinction--the vanity of being thought to have seen what had been seen by no other
mortal; and they triumphantly asked me in turn, what motives Raleigh, and Riley, and
Hunter, and a hundred other travellers, had for their misrepresentations. Finding
argument thus unavailing, I produced visible and tangible proofs of the truth of my
narrative. I showed them a specimen of moonstone. They asserted that it was of the same
character as those meteoric stones which had been found in every part of the world, and
that I had merely procured a piece of one of these for the purpose of deception. I then
exhibited some of what I considered my most curious Lunar plants: but this made the
matter worse; for it so happened, that similar ones were then cultivated in Mr. Prince's
garden at Flushing. I next produced some rare insects, and feathers of singular birds: but
persons were found who had either seen, or read, or heard of similar insects and birds in
Hoo-Choo, or Paraguay, or Prince of Wales's Island. In short, having made up their
minds that what I said was not true, they had an answer ready for all that I could urge in
support of my character; and those who judged most christianly, defended my veracity at
the expense of my understanding, and ascribed my conduct to partial insanity.
There was, indeed, a short suspension to this cruel distrust. An old friend coming to see
me one day, and admiring a beautiful crystal which I had brought from the Moon,

insisted on showing it to a jeweller, who said that it was an unusually hard stone, and that
if it were a diamond, it would be worth upwards of 150,000 dollars. I know not whether
the mistake that ensued proceeded from my friend, who is something of a wag, or from
one of the lads in the jeweller's shop, who, hearing a part of what his master had said,
misapprehended the rest; but so it was, that the next day I had more visiters than ever,
and among them my kinsman, who was kind enough to stay with me, as if he enjoyed my
good fortune, until both the Exchange and the Banks were closed. On the same day, the
following paragraph appeared in one of the morning prints:
"We understand that our enterprising and intelligent traveller, JOSEPH ATTERLEY,
Esquire, has brought from his Lunar Expedition, a diamond of extraordinary size and
lustre. Several of the most experienced jewellers of this city have estimated it at from
250,000 to 300,000 dollars; and some have gone so far as to say it would be cheap at half
a million. We have the authority of a near relative of that gentleman for asserting, that the
satisfactory testimonials which he possesses of the correctness of his narrative, are
sufficient to satisfy the most incredulous, and to silence malignity itself."
But this gleam of sunshine soon passed away. Two days afterwards, another paragraph
appeared in the same paper, in these words:
"We are credibly informed, that the supposed diamond of the famous traveller to the
Moon, turns out to be one of those which are found on Diamond Island, in Lake George.
We have heard that Mr. A----y means to favour the public with an account of his travels,
under the title of 'Lunarian Adventures;' but we would take the liberty of recommending,
that for Lunarian, he substitute Lunatic."
Thus disappointed in my expectations, and assailed in my character, what could I do but
appeal to an impartial public, by giving them a circumstantial detail of what was most
memorable in my adventures, that they might judge, from intrinsic evidence, whether I
was deficient either in soundness of understanding or of moral principle? But let me first
bespeak their candour, and a salutary diffidence of themselves, by one or two
well-authenticated anecdotes.
During the reign of Louis the XIVth, the king of Siam having received an ambassador
from that monarch, was accustomed to hear, with wonder and delight, the foreigner's
descriptions of his own country: but the minister having one