A Narrative of some of the Lords Dealings with George Müller | Page 3

to be baptized, was received into fellowship, but the two others
not. Our consciences were the less affected by this, because all, though
not baptized, might take the Lord's supper with us, at Bethesda, though
not be received into full fellowship; and because at Gideon, where there

were baptized and unbaptized believers, they might even be received
into full fellowship; for we had not then clearly seen that there is no
scriptural distinction between being in fellowship with individuals and
breaking bread with them. Thus matters stood for many months, i.e.
believers were received to the breaking of bread even at Bethesda,
though not baptized, but they were not received to all the privileges of
fellowship.--In August of 1836 I had a conversation with brother H. C.
on the subject of receiving the unbaptized into communion, a subject
about which, for years, my mind had been more or less exercised. This
brother put the matter thus before me: either unbaptized believers come
under the class of persons who walk disorderly, and, in that case, we
ought to withdraw from them (2 Thess. iii. 6); or they do not walk
disorderly. If a believer be walking disorderly, we are not merely to
withdraw from him at the Lord's table, but our behaviour towards him
ought to be decidedly different from what it would be were he not
walking disorderly, on all occasions when we may have intercourse
with him, or come in any way into contact with him, Now this is
evidently not the case in the conduct of baptized believers towards their
unbaptized fellow-believers. The Spirit does not suffer it to be so, but
He witnesses that their not having been baptized does not necessarily
imply that they are walking disorderly; and hence there may be the
most precious communion between baptized and unbaptized believers.
The Spirit does not suffer us to refuse fellowship with them in prayer,
in reading and searching the Scriptures, in social and intimate
intercourse, and in the Lord's work; and yet this ought to be the case,
were they walking disorderly.--This passage, 2 Thess. iii. 6, to which
brother R. C. referred, was the means of showing me the mind of the
Lord on the subject, which is, that we ought to receive all whom Christ
has received (Rom. xv. 7), irrespective of the measure of grace or
knowledge which they have attained unto.--Some time after this
conversation, in May 1837, an opportunity occurred, when we (for
brother Craik had seen the same truth) were called upon to put into
practice the light which the Lord had been pleased to give us. A sister,
who neither had been baptized, nor considered herself under any
obligation to be baptized, applied for fellowship. We conversed with
her on this as on other subjects, and proposed her for fellowship,
though our conversation had not convinced her that she ought to be

baptized. This led the church again to the consideration of the point.
We gave our reasons, from Scripture, for considering it right to receive
this unbaptized sister to all the privileges of the children of God; but a
considerable number, one-third perhaps, expressed conscientious
difficulty in receiving her. The example of the Apostles in baptizing the
first believers upon a profession of faith, was especially urged, which
indeed would be an insurmountable difficulty, had not the truth been
mingled with error for so long a time, so that it does not prove willful
disobedience, if any one in our day should refuse to be baptized after
believing. The Lord, however, gave us much help in pointing out the
truth to the brethren, so that the number of those, who considered that
only baptized believers should be in communion, decreased almost
daily. At last, only fourteen brethren and sisters out of above 180,
thought it right, this Aug. 28, 1837, to separate from us, after we had
had much intercourse with them. [I am glad to be able to add, that, even
of these 14, the greater part afterwards saw their error, and came back
again to us, and that the receiving of all who love our Lord Jesus into
full communion, irrespective of baptism, has never been the source of
disunion among us, though more than forty-four years have passed
away since.]
Sept. 2. I have been looking about for a house for the Orphan Boys,
these last three days. Every thing else has been provided. The Lord has
given suitable individuals to take care of the children, money, &c. In
His own time He will give a house also.
Sept. 6. This morning I accompanied a sister, who had been staying a
night with us, to the steamer. In answer to prayer I awoke at the right
time, the fly came at half-past five, her trunk was got